Saturday, 30 January 2016

PRIEST SACKED FOR REPORTING ABUSE ?

Fr John Gallagher

The diocese of Palm Beach has hit back at claims by one of its priests that he has been ostracized for helping to prosecute a suspected pedophile priest who was jailed for six months for having shown a 14-year-old parishioner up to 40 pornographic images on his phone.

The Catholic Whistleblowers network, which is dedicated to exposing abuse cover-ups, has weighed in in support of Fr. John Gallagher, claiming the diocese of Palm Beach demoted him because he wasn't "silent about alleged sexual abuse of minor children."

Irish-born Gallagher has served in Palm Beach since 2000 and claims he was stood down from his role in the parish of the Holy Name of Jesus Christ in West Palm Beach for reporting abuse-related activities concerning Franciscan​ Fr Jose Palimattom, a visiting priest from India, who had been at the parish of the Holy Name of Jesus Christ for just four weeks in December 2014 when a complaint was made.


Fr Pallimatom
Speaking to the Pat Kenny Radio Show Jan. 27 in Ireland, the 48-year-old priest also claimed that when he contacted the diocese to report the incident the morning after it had been reported to him, the diocesan official told him, "We've dealt with this before, we normally put them on a plane and send them back."
When he told the diocesan official that he was cooperating with the sheriff he was told, "Well you don't have to give them all the information."
According to Gallagher, when he related the fact to the official that the incident between Palimattom and the boy had been captured by a security camera, "they asked me not to reveal that information to the sheriff's office."
In his radio interview, Gallagher alleged that the diocese removed his possessions from his parochial house and changed the locks on his home and his office.
He said shortly after April 1, 2015, "things came to a head between the diocese and myself. They told me you don't think and operate with the same mindset as we operate with."
Police believe Palimattom was grooming the teen. Palimattom served a six-month sentence and was given a year's probation and deported from the U.S.
 On Thursday, Jan. 28, the diocese of Palm Beach issued a news statement in which it revealed that Palimattom had been invited to serve in the parish of the Holy Name of Jesus Christ by Gallagher. It said that during its screening process, no prior misconduct was revealed.
The statement, which was issued by Dianne Laubert, communications director for the Florida diocese, said it was "deeply disheartened and troubled" by the allegations of Gallagher and stated that it could no longer stand by in "relative silence when we know the allegations are a complete inaccurate representation of the facts."
Elsewhere it stated Gallagher "was not named as pastor of Holy Name of Jesus Church for a number of reasons not related to the incident involving Father Palimattom," and that "access to [Gallagher's] residence was never denied him, nor was he refused sacraments."
"At his request, he was placed on leave and continues to receive salary, health insurance and benefits," the statement continued.
According to the diocese, the County Tyrone-born priest was assigned to a different parish as parochial vicar and was due to begin there July 1, 2015, but he never took up the assignment because he asked to be put on medical leave, which was granted by Bishop Gerald Barbarito.



But Gallagher told media that he was "threatened by the diocese, offered a denotation, and I was asked to resign from priesthood."
In his interview with the Pat Kenny Radio Show he said the diocese told him "We are not happy with your performance or what you have done."
According to Gallagher, he had been operating as a one-man parish with nine Mases. "My collection went up 12% and I took $147,000 off the debt in the time that I was there. The people voted with their feet and their support and our Mass attendance went up."
He also highlighted that when he came out of the hospital after his suspected heart attack, the interim pastor in the parish, in addition to changing the locks, had "asked for my keys from Sr. Ann Monahan, a Dominican of over 67 years, and because she had been in my room getting stuff for me he fired her instantly on the spot and he escorted her off the premises like a criminal."
Gallagher said that he contacted both the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith and the Vatican Commission for the Protection of Minors about this matter, but he received no reply or acknowledgement.
He also revealed that Cardinal Sean O'Malley of Boston, who heads up the Vatican safeguarding commission, telephoned him from Rome on Oct. 8, and told him to take a vacation.

O'Malley
NCR sought a response from the archdiocese of Boston on this but received no reply.
According to Gallagher, he decided to go public about the row because after 24 years as a priest, his "legal counsel said to me you have nowhere else to go but into the public domain -- you've given the church every opportunity."
The Catholic Whistleblowers Steering Committee demanded in their statement that the officials of the Catholic Church, including Pope Francis, "intervene justly in this matter."
"It is outrageous that Fr. John Gallagher, who has been complimented and lauded by law enforcement officials for contacting them about alleged sexual abuse of a minor child by a priest, is not being treated as a hero by Catholic Church officials, including his bishop," they said.
The Catholic Whistleblowers group demanded that Gallagher "be restored immediately to priestly ministry with all related faculties, benefits, and apologies."

In addition, they said Barbarito should be fired immediately by Pope Francis for his mishandling of the matter.

17 comments:

  1. I recall Gallagher in Maynooth - a nut!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a very summary conviction! Can you expand?

      Delete
  2. I left Maynooth in the early 90's. JG was a student there in my time. I am surprised to learn that he was eventually ordained. I would absolutely NOT take his version of events at face value. Even given the history of the Catholic Church on child abuse, I would be inclined to believe the diocese on this one - and definitely not him!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well you knew him. The diocese have said that he is doing this because he was not promoted to "pastor" ?

      Delete
    2. Fr Gallagher did not make up the allegation against Fr Pallimatom: the man served a prison sentence for his crime. And a law-enforcement agency congratulated Gallagher for reporting it. What aspect of this makes Gallagher 'a nut'?

      Delete
  3. Gallagher's problems are of his own making and they have nothing to do with him reporting the abuser. Gallagher is using that as an excuse to cover up his own issues and play at being the victim.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MourneManMichael30 January 2016 at 23:44

      Opinion or facts with supporting evidence?
      Please clarify.
      MMM

      Delete
    2. And yet...he was speaking the truth about Fr Pallimatom. Even you, sceptical, as you so clearly are, cannot deny this.

      Delete
  4. What I am saying is this: I do not trust JG and I do not accept his version of events at face value. Period.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If what Gallagher said about the abuser was true (and we both know it is), then, on what reasonable ground, do you dismiss his account of the difficulties between him and his diocese?

      Sure, he may have been 'a nut' at Maynooth, as you claim, but this was...what?...over twenty years. People can and do change. Perhaps he did.

      Have you seen him since?

      Delete
  5. While I know not Gallagher or indeed the case in question whatever happen to open mindednesss and objectivity

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you knew Gallagher, you would understand.

      Delete
    2. To Anonymous at 16.04

      How well do YOU know Gallagher?

      Delete
  6. MourneManMichael1 February 2016 at 00:47

    Despite repeated requests for informational evidence, the commmentator (at times I will later indicate) provides nothing other than what appears to be his personal opinions. In giving times for the anonymous commentator I make the assumption that all are made by the same person. I am obliged to make such guestimates as such commentators seem not to have the wit or wisdom to in some way, even by an anonymous nom de plume, to identify themselves.
    The unsupported comments I refer to are as follows: 30th Jan @ 14:31, @16:31, @22:28; and on 31st Jan @ 14:12 , & 16:04.
    So if you are the one and same person, ......man up, give your evidence, otherwise we are obliged to take your comments as of no value or reliability.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MMMM you do/think whatever the hell you like. It will come out in time that this case is not as JG is portraying it.

      Delete
    2. MourneManMichael1 February 2016 at 19:02

      Thank you anonymous @ 18:14. Your response is revealing. 'Nuf said.
      MMM

      Delete
  7. This article is interesting... some will say a smear, but it's a lot of people and very consistent comment.
    http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Was-Father-Gallagher-a-bad-parish-priest-or-a-hero-exposing-a-pedophile.html

    ReplyDelete