Wednesday 2 May 2018

PRIEST - GAY SEX ON ALTAR!



AN ALLEGATION HAS BEEN MADE THAT AN IRISH PRIEST HAD ORAL AND ANAL SEX WITH A YOUNG MAN ON THE ALTAR IN HIS CHURCH!

The allegation comes from a young man who claims that the priest was trying to seduce him into having sex with him.

As part of the seduction, the young man claims that the priest sent him a number of photographs.

The photographs show a man dressed in a priests' vestments giving a young man oral sex while the young man lay on his back on the altar and altar cloth.



Another picture shows a man with a priests clerical hanging around his penis.



The priest who is the subject of the allegation is in active ministry in an Irish diocese.

On Tuesday when I received the allegations and pictures I sent them to the priest's bishop, to the papal nuncio and to Eamon and Diarmuid Martin as the primates of Ireland as this is not only a diocesan matter but a national matter.


BISHOP XXXXX XXXXXX
BISHOP OF XXXXXXXXX

30th April 2018

Dear Xxxxxxxxx,

I have been contacted today by a young man who has supplied me with photographs he says shows Father Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx having sex with a young man on the altar of Xxxxxxxx parish church where he was PP.

Father Xxxxxxxx sent these pictures to another young man who he was attempting to seduce.

I would be most grateful if you let me know you got this email and assured me you would investigate.

+Pat Buckley

0044 7488 374364

bishopbuckley1@outlook.com


I asked the bishop to assure me that he would investigate the matter.

I have had no reply or comment from any of the four bishops/archbishops I contacted. 

But the bishop in question has said to another party that he cannot comment for legal reasons.


I was able to find a completely independent photograph of the inside of the church where the alleged incident took place.

That picture confirms that this is the interior and altar of the alleged church.


If this allegation is true it must be one of the worst scandals ever - bigger even than the Bishop Casey scandal.

The sexual aspect is disturbing in itself.

But much more serious is the use of a church building and altar for sexual purposes.

If true, this is a case of a massive sacrilege and desecration,

Surely it would have to mean that the church might have to be closed or demolished?

The church and altar could be reconsecrated - but would the people of the parish be happy to go to that church and sit in front of that altar for baptisms, Mass, weddings, and funerals?

Currently, of course, religious services are continuing there as it is most likely that the current priest and the congregation have no idea of what happened there.

I am not easily shocked.

But this allegation shocks me to me very roots!

UPDATE

I'm told the bishop has called in the police to examine the photos?

How is 2 of age men having sex on an altar a criminal matter?

Sacrilege and desecration are not criminal offences.


229 comments:

  1. Dear Pat. I am shocked and astonished at what has been revealed here. I can not believe an ordained priest would have done such an act on an altar. That is just beyond belief.

    You have to question the priest's faith. He must be an atheist, as if he really truly believed in his God, in Jesus, he would never have done such an act on an altar in a church.

    I have heard stories of clergy having sex in the sacristy, meeting rooms and even in their presbyteries. But this just goes one step too far.

    In my opinion, this has to be revealed, where the church is and who the priest is. There is no good in hiding this. The parishioners of this church needs to know, so that action can be taken, and this priest exposed for the moron he is.

    I may not be the most religious of people, and I have my grave concerns over the Roman Catholic Church, but this story just revolts me. I think it will be the same for the most of the readers on this blog.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. think the pictures were photoshopped +Pat. How could this be real? If this is true my faith is deeply shaken in the Church. Please I hope this isn’t a parody. I’m literally shaking in disbelief.

      Delete
  2. I wonder if this was due to a break in of some kind or was the church left unattended and some undesirable people did this for a “laugh” - would a priest be capable of this type of thing?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 'Would a priest be capable of this kind of thing'??? Are you soft in the head?

      Delete
    2. Well Magna Carta no I’m not soft in the head but I’d like to think the vast majority of priests are holy men who would not do this type of thing. You should know as a Christian without hope we have nothing. I truly hope this wasn’t a priest who preaches the good news or acts in the person of Christ.

      Delete
    3. 15:47, that word 'like' is interesting; seems to say a lot about you personally.

      Why do you 'like to think that the vast majority of priests are holy men who would not do this kind of thing'? Is this liking your comfort zone (your fantasy, really) to protect you from the God-awful truth that most priests are not holy?

      Part of personal maturing is learning to accept truth, even unpleasant truth, about oneself, and about the world around.

      When I was in seminary, I was cocooned in a saccharin world about the institutional Roman Catholic Church, but I now recognise it for the filthy, lying w***e it is and always has been.

      I know it can take time and tears to adapt from safe personal fantasy to the reality of life, but it's a journey worth making. In your case, it means accepting that there is, and never can be, any such thing as a 'holy' priest, not least because the Roman Catholic theology of priesthood elevates these men beyond the sinners they really are and above the common run of humanity. The first casualty of this idelogical brainwashing is humility. And it is humility that Jesus called for when he told his disciples that they were not just to act like servants, but to have the attitude of servants. I have never, ever, come across a single Roman Catholic priest with this attitude. Why? Because his seminary formation prepared him to be a master, not a servant.

      Delete
  3. Pat

    Is this an old or young priest? Plus the person on the altar looks like a seminarian in Maynooth who is very skinny.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The priest is 50 - 60.

      I do not know yet who the young man is.

      Today someone told me the priest has had alcohol and drugs issues.

      But that is no excuse for sacrilege or desecration.

      Delete
    2. Pat

      Can you confrim if this is the north or south?

      Delete
    3. If the Irish laity allows this priest to be packed off by the bishops for expensive 'treatment' in the States (like Camley and Coyle), without raising major objections, it will become a laughing stock worldwide. Remember this is YOUR money that these w****s spend on themselves.

      Delete
  4. Pat I think you get sexual gratification from vile photoshoped image's like this!
    If Jesus was here today and you where one of the twelve would he agree with your ministry and that of your side kick James McConnell whos head is demented by you and in turn has his family and community harassed and tortured to beyond belief!
    This young lost soul has his neighbours embarrassed and ashamed to know or speak off him.
    I offer up my bedtime prayers for you that the light of the true message of God will shine in you some day, God Bless you and your family.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This story shocked me to the roots.

      The use of an altar for this disturbs me to the core of my being :-(

      Delete
    2. James McConnell to do with this? As a person that lives close by I can assure you that it's something he's capable of sending to you!
      What is your conection to this sad young man that offers nothing to his family but hell.
      Can you not advise him of psychiatric help cause he's causing you much damage to your character.

      Delete
  5. You must reveal all, +Pat. I mean the priest and the circumstances not the photos.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do think the parishioners should know.

      The church should be closed at least for now.

      Delete
  6. +Pat is this Church within an Archdiocese?

    23:06 - I think saying it looks like a seminarian is unfair we have no idea who this is. That’s total speculation.

    Maybe they will have to demolish the altar as I would not be comfortable having the sacrifice celebrated on this altar anymore after this hideous act.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 23:16 thank you +Pat. I appreciate you telling me. I am not within this dreadful catchment area so - thanks be to God.

      I feel very sorry for the parishioners who are affected in whatever diocese this happened.

      Delete
  7. +Pat I am not throwing dirt but that looks like seminarian Xxx xxx Xxxxxxx

    ReplyDelete
  8. Does this priest have forskin and a big member?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lol if this is true the priest will get the name on here for having a big todger.
      My phone tried to change that into toddler ��

      Delete
  9. Replies
    1. The seminarian is from Armagh. He could have met this priest in Maynooth?

      Delete
    2. It looks like a Cork priest.

      Delete
    3. His mouth. Can you give anymore information? More people may come forward if we know who we are dealing with.

      Delete
    4. I think you need to tell me who you think he is by email.

      I will not lie to you.

      bishopbuckley1@outlook.com

      Delete
  10. "Surely it would have to mean that the church might have to be closed or demolished?"

    I think you're getting a bit carried away, +Pat. If the two men involved are deeply in love, I don't see what the bishops, or the police can do about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This priest does not do "love".

      How is sacrilege and desecration connected to ANY FORM OF LOVE?

      Delete
  11. Pat, if this alleged story is true, I am shocked to my core as a priest. I can't even begin to fathom how any priest would be so audacious to use the SACRED altar in so vile a way. I trust this story can be verified as absolute truth. The truth is vital. If it is true, then this priest must be seriously, psychologically ill and needs professional help. More importantly, he must be removed from ministry. Please confirm the veracity of the story before wrongful allegations are made.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Church is 100 % verified.

      The identy of the priest is alleged.

      The Bishop must investigate.

      Delete
    2. Why must this priest be 'seriously psychologically ill' and in need of 'professional help'? He's just a dirty bastardo! No need for such help, just repentance.

      You self-regarding pricks make me feel ill. Despite all the abuse scandals and cover-ups, you still won't allow yourselves to believe that one of your fellow parasites could do such a dreadful thing. No; he has to be ill, just like those priest bastardos who raped and sodomized children.

      You useless spongers will say and do anything to protect your utterly useless selves.

      Just sayin', like. 😆

      Delete
    3. But Maggie, it's only what we say about you!

      Delete
  12. The man who sent me this information and pictures would meet the bishop involved.

    The Bishop has not even acknowledged my email even though he took other disciplinary action against the priest last year on another matter.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The bishop is probably torn between wanting to kill the priest the allegations are about and wanting to kill Pat!
    It is a bit much to say the young man looks like a certain seminarian simply on the basis of being thin - unless the person who says this is intimately acquainted with his thighs, of course.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The belt gives him away.

      Delete
    2. I also thought the belt on his jeans was VERY DISTINCTIVE.

      Delete
    3. Was it a hand made belt made for a seminarian? Get a grip. Presumably many such belts have been sold. It's not a unique identifier like a fingerprint or a birthmark.

      Delete
  14. Except for the fact that desecration is a crime.

    +Pat, the bishop who handed this to the Gardai and said he cannot comment has acted 100% correctly. Desecration in a criminal offense and not one to be taken lightly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is desecration a crime?

      Under which statute?

      Delete
    2. Should the current PP be celebrating Mass on that altar?

      Delete
    3. Sorry my bad, its normally under Criminal Damage charges with Judges using the word Desecration. This probably does not apply.

      However to do such a thing in a public place may result in indecency charges.

      Delete
  15. + Pat, I am a regular reader of your blog, and have found many of the revelations over the past couple of years to be shocking and deeply disconcerting, but this allegation, if true, brought me to tears. I cannot fathom how a priest could behave so atrociously in such s sacred space. Those in his parish need to be told, ASAP.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If the bishop does not "man up" I will inform the parishioners.

      Delete
    2. Are we dealing with a PP and a Maynooth seminarian?

      Delete
    3. 23:41, why the tears? Don't you yet know that a Roman Catholic priest is capable of anything?

      Don't be surprised at these revelations. Expect them.

      Delete
  16. Replies
    1. Magna Carta's Mum3 May 2018 at 00:40

      They don't fail me, Canon. I knew it would come to this the day little Magna came to me clutching Plainsong for Schools and with tears in his eyes. It was the news that the Holy Father wanted an aggiornamento that upset him, and I knew things would never be the same.

      Delete
  17. Pat I think it is fr Xxx Xxxxxxx and Xxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx. If yes just reply yes to your last comment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is not the Name I have.

      Although I believe that the priest you mention is sexually involved with seminarians.

      Delete
  18. Pat, were the modesty blobs added by you, or were they in the photos when you received them? The photo looks photoshopped to me. The older man’s mouth and face don’t look like there’s anything in the mouth, which suggests photoshopping. He looks like someone with a cigarette not a..... And is what he’s alleged to be holding in his mouth anatomically correct in terms of size and location? And really, if he were so twisted as to desecrate a church and altar in this way, would he really have a third person present to document it? And then send it on to another young man afterwards? It’s hard to accept that this is real.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I added the modesty blobs.

      I have the fully unblobbed pictures as does the bishop and Diarmuid and Eamon Martin and the Nuncio and 2 journalists.

      I believe the priest took the pictures using a selfie stick.

      Delete
  19. Bishop Buckley. you have seen the priest in question in the photograph. Do you believe this to be a priest of the diocese you have contacted?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Is this Xxxxxxx Diocese. Fr Xxxxxx. Regardless, I am absolutely speechless sitting here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No. But the name you mentioned has been mentioned twice tonight.

      We obviously have other priests involved in liturgical sex.

      Delete
  21. This will be done to placate and please the Horned God
    This is a form of Satanism.
    The more sacred the place and the people, the greater is the Victory.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Of course desecration is a crime! In the same way vandalism is a crime! In any case, this pervert “priest” is toast.

    ReplyDelete
  23. The sanctuary of the parish church in question is first of all the Ara coeli and its profanation is an offence to the Most High God. The sacred liturgy is the vestibule of heaven where time meets eternity and so its proper activities are eschatological events. It is also the sacred space in which generations have been baptised, made their first holy communion, been confirmed, confessed their sins, been ordained, been married and received their final commendation to eternity. If I discovered that two people had sex on my kitchen table, I would cleanse it before I ate at it again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well spoken.

      The church needs reconsecreation.

      The parishioners need informed.

      Delete
    2. Pat you have a moral responsibility to name the Church at the very least. We can figure out the priest later. People will go for Mass there tomorrow and break bread on that altar!!!

      Delete
    3. I am considering that.

      But what about the bishop of the diocese?

      The current PP has absolutely no connection with the incident.

      Delete
    4. If the bishop did not reply then you have to assume he is not doing anything about it.

      Clearly state that the priest there at the moment has nothing to do with it.

      It will not be an easy subject to approach but allow the people to know what went on there. Wouldn't you like to know?

      Delete
    5. Bishop we discussed earlier on your blog about the ontological (don't know if spelt right) change of a man to priest. Surely this example would diminish this belief? After reading this I sincerely doubt priesthood comes from laying of hands from an institution and rather is a heart felt call that only the person can discern/decipher?
      With Respect
      A supporter of your work.

      Delete
    6. 00:53, hope they both had the decency to remove the fruits (stains) of their mutual bonding. (I dread to think that they may have overlooked the inevitable skid marks, though. 😲)

      Delete
    7. 00:44, you mean you would continue to eat off your kitchen table (having first cleaned it) even though you knew it had been the locus for copulation and an exchange of bodily fluids???? (Excuse me while I barf.😵)

      Would you mind posting your address? It's just that I don't want to visit your home by mistake and have you make me up a ham sandwich on said table.

      Delete
    8. Magna Carta's Mum3 May 2018 at 16:52

      Now Magna, I've told you that stains are not inevitable. One to wipe and one to polish is all it takes.

      Delete
  24. Hi pat. You should go to the local papers in the county in question with your story today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Irish Independent has the story.

      The Bishop has confirmed to them that there is an investigation under way.

      Delete
  25. There is something fundamentally shocking and wrong about this activity on many levels. Even as an atheist, who retains a deep affection for the Catholic church, I simply can't begin to understand the mindset which could lead to this. Do not be shy Pat - expose it for the good of the decent people who continue to believe. Evil is not too strong a word.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I personally find this comment (@1:05) to be deeply moving, and I'm very grateful to the person who wrote it. I'm a practising Catholic, but still must praise how this is very well said. Thank you

      Delete
    2. 01:05, why would any self-respecting 'atheist... retain a deep affection for the Catholic Church'? It makes no sense. You're obviously a former Catholic ('RETAINS a deep affection...'). Is it your way of hedging your bets? You know: making sure that your soul's ass is covered, just in case there is a God after all and you want to impress him with your,er, retained deep affection?

      You're not a genuine atheist; you're a coward driven by a deep-seated fear of damnation.

      Well, you have the Church to thank for that. You know: the one you've retained such deep affection for.😆

      Delete
    3. Shush, Blue Magna!

      Delete
    4. 13:28, erm, umm, ahh...no!😆

      Delete
    5. 12.46, Magna. I have many friends, once Catholic, but now agnostic, humanist or atheist. They continue to support me as a priest, have admiration for the wonderful good work they witness being done, have respect for the Church while being critical of and horrified by many abuses, but have honest minds and are people of fairness, balance and integrity. They are not dangerous bigots and full of poisonous hatred, like you. You're the one who needs to learn SELF RESPECT and RESPECT FOR OTHERS.

      Delete
    6. 14:26, you know what I hate most of all, priest? Even more than I hate the theological conceit and deception for Roman Catholic priesthood? It's Roman Catholic priests, like you, who are not honest.

      Now here's a seeming paradox, priest: can a Roman Catholic priest, a perceived man of truth, really be associated with untruthfulness? Just as much with this as he has been with the rape and sodomy of children, with spending vast sums of money, even in time of economic recession, doing up his palace, with vanity, with pride, and with clerical arrogance. In a nutshell priest, clericalism.

      You are deceiving yourself, priest, about your atheist, agnostic, and humanist hangers-on: what they are doing is their insurance policy against the possibility that they may be wrong after all about the non-existence of God. But they are too shit-scared, like you priest, to admit it to themselves.

      Bless you, Mother.😆

      Delete
    7. 12:46 Magna. I think your response to my post was unnecessarily aggressive, but more importantly it is incorrect. Most people who leave the Catholic church don't stomp off in a bitter rage, they simply cease to believe and walk quietly away. I don't resent my Catholic upbringing, in fact it was a positive and enriching experience and formed many of the values I continue to hold. I am grateful to the many teachers, friends, priests, volunteers along the way (or at least to most of them). Today I see many positive social contributions which originate in the church community, and small acts of kindness and comfort, the result of good people simply trying to do the right thing.
      So, without any fear of or belief in "damnation", and respecting the fact that the experience of others might be very different, I will continue my "deep affection" for a community of people who, for the most part, contribute positively to the experience of life.

      Delete
    8. I apologise for the overly-aggressive reply and have taken your comments on board.

      Delete
  26. Pat must now sleep.

    Keep your comments coming.

    Will publish them early morning.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Bishop Pat has cut/edited out some of the photo, especially the one in the priest's vestment bent over. The far altar was too recognizable. I contacted Bishop Pat to make sure something was done.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Bishop Pat, in the ould tongue isn't a parish church defined as 'the house of the people'? What is that? So, the diocese supplied a rogue landlord in the house of the people. Maybe 12 just men should go in and remove that altar and let the overseer provide a new one at his own expense, just as he supplied the rogue landlord.

    ReplyDelete
  29. And to think that the MORONIC Irish laity are financially supporting these useless SPONGERS!

    Fuckin' useless Irish laity.😆

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Magna Carta's Mum3 May 2018 at 08:25

      Now, Magna, what have I told you?
      People don't want your opinions, and particularly not with language like that.

      Delete
    2. And what kind of language is appropriate for such pictures and for such people who allow this kind of evil to go on, and to continue going on, by uncritically and financially supporting such a parasitical institution as the Roman Catholic Church, whose bishops are prepared to ordain men they KNOW are highly unsuitable for priesthood?

      These arrogant, episcopal bastardos are allowing Satan greater and greater influence in the Church through their lack of belief in Christ, their lack of prayer, their lack of pastoral and other support they would claim to have for the 'sheep' in their care, you the Irish laity. Some of these bishops may even be sexually compromised themselves. Remember that without the influence of this blog, more unsuitable candidates for the priesthood might have been ordained: and, sadly, they still may be ordained when the dust settles.

      The Irish laity have enormous power over these vile, Christ-betraying bastardos (the bishops) if only, like that great lumbering farm horse in Animal Farm, they realised it.

      STOP FINANCIALLY SUPPORTING THESE PEOPLE AND DEMAND MAJOR INPUT INTO THE SELECTION, FORMATION AND EDUCATION OF CANDIDATES FOR SEMINARY.

      This matter should no longer be under the influence of the Irish episcopacy; it cannot be trusted.

      Delete
  30. A story the old news of the world would be proud of. What worries me is the mindset behind all of this. What does it say about church Priesthood and society

    ReplyDelete
  31. Two guys over the age of consent having sex is not a crime even though the location is somewhat vulgar. They were probably drunk and larking about. An apology should suffice.

    Least said, soonest mended.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @06.08 What sort of cloud cuckoo land do you inhabit where an apology will just suffice!! This is so grotesque and morally offensive to many that apologies will not even cover it. I have been shocked at the behaviour of some Priests of late but THIS is beyond shocking.

      Delete
    2. Get over yourself.

      Delete
    3. @07:05

      The Canadian priest who molested over 200 deaf boys is beyond shocking, or the Tuam baby scandal. A frustrated priest and an equally frustrated seminarian having it off on the altar doesn’t even come close.

      The parishioners are probably just relieved it was only two adults involved.

      Delete
  32. Will you you waste of space. We are debating a serious matter here and you are coming out with stupid juvenile crap. Get a life 00.40

    ReplyDelete
  33. UPDATE

    I have been informed that the bishop of the diocese celebrated Confirmation Mass on that altar a number of weeks ago.

    ReplyDelete
  34. It's not Achonry or Clogher then........neither has a bishop!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lisnaskea Leonard3 May 2018 at 17:18

      Clogher has a bishop-in-waiting in the excellent Mgr Joseph McGuinness.

      Delete
    2. @17.18 By you naming him means he will definitely not get it.

      Delete
  35. Bishop Pat. I think you should inform the clergy and people of the parish immediately.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am sure the parishioners will be left sickened and shocked but they'll get over it soon enough.

      Delete
  36. Can you unedit the priests face or put up a picture of the inside of the Church without the name? It is hard to work out who it is as it stands.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The story will unfold and all information will be eventually published.

      Delete
    2. That’ll be nice.

      And, of course, the same-sex participants can look forward to a free trip to America for therapy. That’s the usual procedure, isn’t it?

      Delete
  37. Who took the photos ?
    Was there a third person there or were they all selfies?

    ReplyDelete
  38. Another part of me asks is this some sort of wind up. It's the stuff of off the wall x rated films

    ReplyDelete
  39. Pat we need more to go on

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is a very serious story and must be handled with a certain momentum. Be patient.

      Delete
    2. 08.16 You are not entitled at the moment to “need more to go on”. The Parish involved have more entitlement than you when this matter is eventually exposed in full. So cool your jets and let’s not let your nosiness get the better of you.

      Delete
  40. It’s getting rather tedious that posters are trying to find out by process of elimination the Priest and Church involved. I’m sure we will be made aware of the facts through the media sooner rather than later. I know people are naturally curious and very nosey but we will know the facts in due course. Well done Pat for bringing this to our attention.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you.

      I think the people of the parish should be informed first.

      Delete
  41. +Pat said he added modesty blobs. Well unless as someone else suggested the man bent over is not smoking a cigarette the person lying on the altar has a pencil penis.

    I’d say this is an April fools for slow learners.

    I’d say they are having you on +Pat. No man or priest would do this unless he was stoned or blind drunk or disturbed to his core.

    The paper won’t publish this. Not with the WMOF coming up in a few months.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The priest does have other problems, I believe.

      Delete
    2. It’s very worrying +Pat. I don’t disbelieve you but as I sit here thinking if this is true how deeply upset and disturbed I am.

      By all mean do whatever you want sexually with whoever you want provided you’re two consenting adults but don’t do this.

      While I feel upset I’m equally very angry with even the thought of a priest doing this in God’s House.

      Delete
    3. I have recently come across reports of 2 other priests being caught naked with sex toys on altars.

      I cannot comprehend why priests, or anyone, would involve altars in their sex lives.

      Is it some new kind of fetish or philia?

      Delete
    4. PS: Or is it an evil and Satanic thing?

      Delete
    5. Yes +Pat I think you are spot on. This is a grave form of evil. I never thought I’d see the day. That is not to take away other evils in the church but this is sickening to the pit of my stomach.

      Delete
    6. Indeed.

      The only creature who would be "happy" with these sacrilege would be Satan@

      Delete
    7. As I've said on this blog a few weeks ago Pat, there are a few Priests in Ireland sending consecrated Hosts to Satanists in America to celebrate Black Masses. I believe this is all part of the Occult and desecrating churches (particularly the altar) is all part of it. I believe some priests are devil worshippers

      Delete
    8. Who would smoke a cigarette in vestments?
      If you click on the picture to make it bigger the thing being sucked looks less white and more, well, flesh coloured.

      Delete
    9. It's quite small.

      Delete
  42. 08.25 Stop trying to hijack this serious topic today (Whatever Magna) you claim to be. I’m fed up to the back teeth having stupid childish comments fill this blog all day. Just go away and shut up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I apologise for any inconvenience caused. I will just do as you say, go away and never speak again

      Delete
    2. We'll hold you to that, 09:49.😆

      Delete
  43. I see that Bergolio has finally admitted that he was part of the problem in the Barros affair. The problems go right to the top.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/pope-to-chile-abuse-victims-i-was-part-of-the-problem/2018/05/02/53512422-4e28-11e8-85c1-9326c4511033_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.fc9c32319c9c

    ReplyDelete
  44. Pat

    Can i ask if it was a seminarian who sent these pictures to you?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was thinking the same thing. How would some random stranger know to go to Pat unless he moves in clerical circles. Hmmm

      Delete
    2. The priest in question was, allegedly, sending these pictures to young gay men on social media to show them what he liked doing.

      These young gay men sent the pictures to other young gay men.

      Delete
  45. Oh dear, what a mess !

    What, in the Lord's name, possesses anybody to engage in such behaviour on the altar, in a church ? Even in their drunken, or drug -fuelled, stupor, surely there was a little voice in the mind saying that this was not the right thing to do ?

    I trust that this matter will be dealt with professionally by the Church / Diocese concerned. There may well not have been a crime committed if both people concerned are over the age of consent. But, this behaviour, by a priest, with someone with whom he may have had some professional relationship, in a place where one reasonably could expect decent behaviour, amounts to gross misconduct and bringing the Church in to disrepute. In any other organisation / business, this matter would be dealt with according to protocols that would see the priest individual dismissed. Let us hope this happens.

    There was an earlier comment about these picture being sent via mobile phone to other phones. This could constitute an offence in law if these pictures are deemed to be lewd, pornographic etc. The priest concerned, if he sent them, might well find himself the subject of a police investigation. That should concentrate his mind !

    ReplyDelete
  46. Pat be careful, there are people out there who want to see you destroyed. They are manipulative and deceitful. You've been given fake photos and false information in the past so be careful! Don't get carried away.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you.

      I am in personal contact with the person who sent me the photos.

      Delete
    2. 09.32: Pat, as mentioned to you before. Proceed with utmost caution unless you can verify the absolute truth. Under new Data Protection Law from 25th May. Any one of us can face hefty fines for breaching any privacy and recklessly defaming or destroying reputations and posting material without consent of said person/s. Perhaps someone is setting you up for a fall. . Beware..

      Delete
    3. I think you should give Pat more credit because he's not the sort to walk blind into anything you suggest. He's been proven right with photos of Rory, MCCamley etc in the past and I'm sure he will be proven right in this case also.

      Delete
    4. And, I am proceeding with great caution.

      Delete
    5. Also, the priest may be the victim of revenge porn, although (unfortunately) we haven’t seen his complete full-frontal.

      Concerned OAP.

      Delete
    6. Stop making stupid excuses for this Priest. It's people like you that make a bad situation worse by trying to pretend it didn't happen and coming up with all sorts of fanciful ideas to try not believing it. Well you better believe it.

      Delete
    7. You're making a mountain out of a molehill, no jurisdiction whether ROI or UK would waste time on such a matter. Least said soonest mended.

      Delete
  47. The relevant comment is at 00.39.This is a Satanist ritual which needed the desecration of the most sacred earthly space available when the Horned God wishes to spit in the face of the Breaded Christ of Calvary .

    ReplyDelete
  48. Bishop Pat - this is the law of GDPR for Bloggers:

    Does GDPR apply to me?

    It applies to you if you process personal information AND are processing it as part of an enterprise. Article 4(18) defines enterprise as ‘a natural or legal person engaged in an economic activity, irrespective of its legal form, including partnerships or associations regularly engaged in an economic activity’. So basically, it seems that if you aren’t making any money through your blog you are ok

    ReplyDelete
  49. It seems is ridiculous, +Pat, to demolish the church just because of this rather vulgar frolic.

    Concerned OAP.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I understand.

      But would the parishioners be happy going to Mass there and looking at the altar all the time?

      Delete
    2. 11:16, 'rather vulgar frolic'?? Is your skull cracked? Or are you normally this divorced mentally from reality?

      You have a propensity for understatement, born of... What? I dunno. If none of the above, then maybe you're just common-or-garden...thick!😆

      Delete
    3. I expect, on balance, the parishioners would be more concerned about the demolition of their church. After all, churchgoers at St Mary’s Cathedral have presumably recovered from the shock of KOB’s alternative use of the confessional for a quickie.

      Delete
    4. To my knowledge KOB never had sex on an altar?

      Delete
    5. As far as I’m concerned +Pat is right. The altar and sanctuary area are not the same as a confession box - for obvious reasons. That’s not to say I’d agree with this activity in any part of a church. But the altar is most sacred.

      Delete
  50. +Pat, I think you are blogging today about my diocese? Cloyne PP.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Pat, have you sent the evidence/picture about King Puck to the Nuncio?

    That he is assisting at funerals as a deacon would indicate that Brown is going to ordain him.

    If he is up to the behaviour alleged, he should be dismissed from the clerical state - not ordained.

    Some bishops are thick as two short planks and stubborn to boot. You should send your dossier to the Nuncio.

    The Church needs deliverance from unworthy and unsuitable ministers. This latest escapade, reported on your blog today, sex on an Altar where Mass is offered, is without question demonic activity.

    This perverted priest is highly dangerous, spiritually, to the Faith and to his parishioners.

    If his “accomplice” is a seminarian, as some are suspecting, then the plot thickens.

    In any case this gangrenous limb needs amputated and speedily.

    Just be careful though that it’s not a set up.

    ReplyDelete
  52. It seems too far-fetched to be true.

    ReplyDelete
  53. They said the same about Casey being too far fetched

    ReplyDelete
  54. 09:20, you 'trust thst this matter will be dealt with professionally by the Church/Diocese concerned'????? You .....

    ReplyDelete
  55. Is Mass still being celebrated on this altar? I hope the Bishop is doing something to stop it if it is.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Mass is still being celebrated on the altar.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Magna at 13.35, your vile comment does no favour, yet again, for you. You full of hatred, bigotry and offensive, pornographic language. Thank God the vast, vast majority of priests work with great dedication and integrity. They work steadfastly for the well being of others, despite their human flaws and sinfulness. Thank God too that parishes were spared your abusive behaviour by being flung out of the seminary. Have you ever wondered why not one person on this blog supports you? Apart from Pat. Your comments incite hatred. Your language, your views indicate a serious dysfunction in your psychological make up. You are damaged, so seek help. on PRIEST -

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jeez! You're a long-winded bore.😆

      Delete
    2. I support Magna
      I detest all posts that attack him personally.
      Post not poster is my motto.

      Delete
    3. Why don’t you poster 14.16 refer to content not redicule poster.
      You are anything but holy or compassionate.

      Delete
    4. This blog is not about Magna Carta attention seeker ok.

      Delete
    5. Lol @ Magna Carta calling someone else a long-winded bore!
      @16:12 this blog *is* about MC, has been for months and Pat seems to like that. The motivations of either of them can only be bizarre.

      Delete
    6. I apologise for any hurt I have caused anyone.

      Delete
    7. 16:44, but I don't. 😆

      Delete
    8. 15.16, I don't pretend to be holy or compassionate but I certainly try my best. How can anyone take Magna seriously, the one who thinks it's legitimate to print his vile, nasty, hate inciting and poisonous comments, he who has no respect for others, having lost all self respect? His comments are contemptible and the author the equivalent of trailer trash. Sorry, but how many commentators ever support his viciousness, bigotry and offensive style? Get real.

      Delete
  58. Well there's one question which would explain a lot but nobody has asked or answered yet:
    Is a thin Maynooth seminarian looking embarrassed today because the smallness of his penis is being discussed on Pat Buckley's blog?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, we don't know for sure that it's small...in terms of length...because we don't know how much of it has docked in that dirty honcho's mouth. But we CAN tell that it is, circumferentially, small.��

      Delete
    2. In the non redacted photo it looks perfectly within the normal range.

      Delete
    3. Size is not everything.

      Delete
    4. If mine was that thin I wouldn't allow any photos to be taken.

      Delete
    5. Disgusting comment!

      Delete
  59. Hopefully they have CCTV in the church and this will have been captured. It won’t make for pleasant viewing but it will prove who did what etc.

    Some churches have web cams installed. Imagine this had been streamed live on a web cam?? And before anyone says anything some parishes leave the cameras on 24/7 and don’t just broadcast when a mass is being celebrated.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Very true, Magna, very true.

    ReplyDelete
  61. None of this would have happened before Vatican II.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Really, 15:48? So why was there need for Fr Gerald Fitzgerald's Congregation of the Servants of the Paraclete? Founded in the 1940s by Fitzgerald, its mission was to treat, among others, priests guilty of sexual misconduct, including the sexual violation of children.

      You don't have to be an idiot; you just need to divest yourself of that anti-Vatican II prejudice you are nursing.

      Delete
    2. Except it wasn't. Fitzgerald didn't want to 'treat' sexual offenders, didn't want psychological methods and wanted to apply the remedies of faith. He considered sexual abusers to be unreformable.
      You, MC, can only ever be an idiot because there is no alternative for you.

      Delete
    3. I am sorry about my intemperate comments earlier.

      Delete
    4. 16:38, Fr Fitzgerald EVENTUALLY realised that the sexual abusers he had been dealing with were effectively untreatable.

      In 2009, his papers were eventually unsealed. These revealed that Fitzgerald had asked the American bishops and the Vatican (including Pope Paul VI) not to reassign offending priests to parish ministry as he considered them likely to to reoffend; in fact, he did suggest that the Church should purchase an island, where these men could reside, away from temptation.😆

      Delete
    5. 16:46, no I'm not. 😆

      Delete
    6. I, at 15:48, was referring to sex on altars. As Paul VI said after Vatican II, as he surveyed the wreckage "the smoke of Satan has entered into the Church".

      Delete
  62. Pat, with some of the comments you are printing, you're allowing your blog to descend into pornography which I think belittles the seriousness of the alleged issue. Some contributors are literally "getting off" in their sexual fantasies, imagining they are the ones on the altar. They're not at all interested in the truth. It's all very disgusting, sordid and nauseating, including the alleged event in the Church. Can you please verify, if possible, for once that all this occurred.

    ReplyDelete
  63. I am Disgusted with this but not shocked however I am delighted that the Bishop is taking action and rightly so however do not under estimate the Papal Nuncio he is very Talented and Archbishop Eamon Martin is talented and very able however there is only ONE Primate of Ireland and that is Eamon Martin.
    I am Delighted as I say above because in Glasgow the current Archbishop has promoted a PP who had self sex on the Altar alone however he got sex therapy and was promoted and it was in the Press so Ireland be thankfully the Bishops are acting and hopefully throwing the sexual active clergy out the door ASAP.

    ReplyDelete
  64. http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/12792323.Priest_resigns_after_claims_of__apos_sex_incident_apos_/

    Back in promoted post at the Archdiocese by Archbishop Philip.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Glasgow Priest Surround in Church with sex toys welcomed back.
    http://clericalwhispers.blogspot.co.uk/2009/08/sins-of-father-tears-and-recriminations.html

    Just shows how Archbishops operate.

    ReplyDelete
  66. you contacted the archbishops. why? is the priest known to them? has he some other public function?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because of the size of the scandal and they being the primates.

      Delete
  67. Magna Carta's Mum3 May 2018 at 17:42

    This is a very proud day for me, although Magna could have chosen a more conventional way to tell me he's gay. You see, that's my Magna there on the altar, I recognise him by the dimensions of his 'selfie stick'. Congratulations, son, on finally being honest to yourself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. now that your son is a 'celeb', would you be interested in appearing in the new season of 'dancing with the stars'?

      Delete
    2. Magna Carta's Mum3 May 2018 at 18:06

      Bless your heart, not with my hip, love.

      Delete
  68. why is the media not carrying the story? why hasn't the priest been suspended? I'm not buying this story

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We don't need you to "buy" anything.

      I expect a media story tomorrow.

      My Blog tomorrow will give more detailed info.

      Delete
    2. PS: The alleged priest may be in a facility just now.

      Delete
  69. 17:32, how in Hades do you know that before Vat II sex wasn't taking place on altars. As for Pope Paul, he was a depressive; that melodramatic remark, from 1972, fits his natural melancholic personality. Get a grip on yourself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He was also an active homosexual.

      Delete
    2. Are you one of the ex-priests Paul VI referred to as Judases?

      Delete
    3. Pope Paul's husband was the actor Paulo Carlini.

      Delete
    4. 18:14, it was those priests who remained in ministry while leading morally double lives, and popes, like Paul VI, who covered up for sexually abusing priests, who were the real Judases.

      Fr Gerry Fitzgerald warned Paul that abusing priests should not be returned to parishes, yet he was ignored.

      Paul betrayed children and their parents, so if he considered priests who left ministry as Judases, he was speaking from experience of personal betrayal.

      18:07, there is no evidence I'm aware of that Paul was an active homosexual.

      Delete
    5. Soz for my bad temper earlier. I'm going to have a fish finger sandwich and a nap. See you all soon.��

      Delete
    6. I love the way any criticism of the V2 gets Magna Carta steaming lol

      Delete
  70. Will you address my serious concerns about this guy McConnell please as I'm considering leaving your blog for good.
    You fail to seek help for him as he lives in a world which he imagines he's you!

    ReplyDelete