Tuesday, 9 February 2016


BY: Michael Brown.

Outspoken British atheist Stephen Fry was recently asked what he would say to God if such a being really existed and he encountered him/her/it after death. His reply was passionate, eloquent, defiant and irreverent. I wonder what God might say to him.
How would the Creator respond to being characterized by a mere mortal as "utterly evil ... capricious, mean-minded, stupid" and "monstrous," among other choice descriptions?
The first error made by Fry was assuming he would be able to speak at all in God's presence, having no idea that he would suddenly encounter perfect purity, unimaginable love, absolute goodness, untainted justice, blazing truth and unadulterated light.

In a moment, he would be overwhelmed by his own sinfulness—not so much as an atheist but as a human being—his selfishness, his arrogance, his carnality and his hypocrisy.
Rather than rebuking God, he would be reproaching himself, wailing aloud, "I am so very, very sorry for who I am and what I have done. Could you possibly have mercy on a wretch like me?"
But what of the substance of his remarks? What if he could have his say with God? How would the Lord respond?
Fry was outraged that an allegedly loving and compassionate God could allow such terrible suffering among His creation, stating that he would say to the Deity, "bone cancer in children, what's that about? How dare you. How dare you create a world where there is such misery that's not our fault? It's not right. It's utterly, utterly evil."
God might say to him, "I applaud you for your moral indignation. In fact, you got it straight from Me. If you were simply the result of a freak, unguided evolutionary accident and your brain waves were just the result of neurons firing, you would have no more moral indignation than a zebra being eaten alive by lions or a fly being devoured by a spider.

"The very fact that you care and that you know that such suffering is not right is a reflection of my image in you. But in reality, you don't know the half of it. I am in constant pain because of the suffering of my creation. The cries and agony are in my ears day and night."
As explained by the German Christian leader Basilea Schlink, "Anyone who loves as much as God does cannot help suffering. And anyone who really loves God will sense that He is suffering."
The Lord might also say, "There's something else you're missing. Your own race commits the most horrific, barbaric atrocities day and night—willfully and with premeditation—from burning people alive in a cage to raping little children, from kidnapping and torturing innocent victims to blowing up hundreds of people at a time.

"Yet I don't just step in and wipe them all out. Why? Because I am more longsuffering than you could ever imagine, and I have created you with a free will so that you could choose to love Me or hate Me. Would you prefer that I take your freedom from you? Or would you prefer that you never existed?"
Of course, Fry had his guns fully loaded, stating that he would say to God, "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid god who creates a world which is so full of injustice and pain?"
The Creator might reply, "What you fail to understand is that for Me to create a world inhabited by free moral agents involves the possibility of evil and great suffering, and it is the freedom of the human race that has produced the agony of the human race."
"But," Fry would surely protest, "bone cancer in children is surely not their fault. Natural disasters that wipe out thousands in a moment of time are surely not our fault."
Or to quote his exact words, "Yes, the world is very splendid, but it also has in it insects whose whole life cycle is to burrow into the eyes of children and make them blind ... ."
In response, the Lord might say, "Doesn't it seem contradictory to you that I could make such an incredible universe and world, filled with such beauty and splendor and majesty, with human beings standing as the pinnacle of my creation, crafted with precision and skill beyond all mortal calculation, and yet a world filled with those deadly insects you mentioned?  Did you ever wonder about that?
"If only you had seen the world before what we call 'the Fall.' You would have been utterly stunned by its beauty and perfection. And if you could see the world to come, a world devoid of pain and heartache, a world devoid of plague and pestilence, a world devoid of murder and rape, a world of indescribable wonder and beauty, you would be astonished beyond words.
"It is human sin that has polluted this world, and I am in the process of turning this terrible evil into something incredibly good. And although this completely transcends your understanding—remember that what you don't know is infinitely greater than what you do know—it will be worth it all in the end."
According to Fry, "The god who created this universe, if he created this universe, is quite clearly a maniac, an utter maniac, totally selfish. We have to spend our lives on our knees thanking him. What kind of god would do that?"
To this God might say, "Does anyone force you to look at beauty? Does anyone require you to appreciate good? I call on My creation to worship Me to remind them of who I am and who they are—after all, it is My prerogative as Creator—but in doing so, as they gaze on me and recognize My holy qualities, they are raised up in character and attitude and faith, becoming more and more like Me, coming into the fullness of My image in them.
"Whatever I do for My glory I also do for your good, if you only recognize who I am and humble yourself before Me."
Fry claimed that "atheism is not just about not believing that there is a God. ... It's perfectly apparent that he is monstrous. Utterly monstrous and deserves no respect whatsoever. The moment you banish him, life becomes simpler, purer, cleaner, more worth living in my opinion."

To the contrary, as countless millions will attest, it is the moment you truly come to know Him and experience Him that life takes on real meaning. And we come to know Him most fully through Jesus.
Perhaps God would have ended things on that note, saying, "What you have completely overlooked is that I am not some indifferent bystander. I get involved in the pain of my creation.
"In fact, through Jesus, I entered into this world and took the place of sinners and rebels and tyrants and scoundrels and mass murderers and every other foul expression of humanity, giving My Son as a payment for your transgressions so that you, along with every other person who has ever lived, might go free and might enjoy My blessing forever.
"Are you really going to reproach Me, Stephen?"
A caller to my radio show suggested that at the root of atheism was a sense of divine betrayal, as if God had somehow let the person down in their moment of greatest need, after which they concluded that He must not be there at all.
As my friend Dr. Frank Turek often says, what many atheists really feel is: "There is no God, and I hate Him."
Perhaps this is what happened to Fry as well, or perhaps, as a homosexual, he felt excluded by the church and rejected by God.
Either way, I imagine in this encounter beyond the grave that the Lord might have pinpointed the root of Fry's atheism, at which moment he might have dissolved in tears, for the first time seeing the love of the Father.
The good news is that Stephen Fry is yet living and breathing, and where there's life, there's hope.
Let's lift up a prayer on his behalf.


  1. MourneManMichael9 February 2016 at 20:53

    To be absolutely blunt, and frank, this post had me almost in tears, ......of laughter!
    Yet again we have someone starting off his argument from the presupposition that god DOES exist, without giving a shred of evidence for the fact. And all the supposed godlike qualities are of similar value.
    This belief in god and all his imagined qualities [desired and longed for as an 'answer' to the caprice of the human condition] seems so imbued in people as to be universally accepted as unquestionable fact, with no critical evaluation:
    A) of the implications of the reality of the existence of the deity, and
    B) of the psychological, parental and societal influences from infancy onwards
    to 'go with the flow' of unquestioning belief.
    And then of course there is the wonderous 'get out of jail' explanatory myth of original sin as the basis for all our afflictions, but let's not burden ourselves too much with examining that one!
    Let me clarify that I do believe a historical Jesus did exist, led an exemplary life and, as elsewhere in history showed humankind how we should be good and kind to each other. But as for all the rest: belief in god, religious practices etc etc ad nauseum: wishful mythology!
    But please do prove me wrong, and I look forward to your evidence

  2. Well done Fry and well done to you, bring the Catholic Church and God down. Keep your energy of hatred up towards those Godly instruments.

  3. I am very always very disinclined to challenge another poster or ever to try and change anyone's deeply set convictions but I will say --though actually God is an Infinite Being and therefore cannot be fully rationalised by our wonderful but nevertheless limited human intelligence --that some people might find it interesting to read "Twenty Arguments for the Existence of God" by Peter Kreeft and Fr Ronald Tacell S.J. It will not make you believe though. No miracle will either. For belief, you need the Gift of Faith. Until that moment, you must continue as a Seeker and ask questions. That is worthy of my respect. It is, for one reason or another in your life, where you are now. "Seek and you shall find--" When you are ready God will find you and you will be overwhelmed by his love and peace. Who knows what methods He will use -- what person- place ---experience --!! He is patient and so you must be patient with yourself, particularly if you have unsolved issues and the pent up anger of unshed tears. Thank you for reading this --

  4. Thanks for that Cecily. Your post is thoughtful and considerate.
    I've scanned Kreeft and Tacell's 20 arguments online today, but found much of it tautological. I've also scanned various commentators on their arguments. There are many much better educated, articulate and analytical than I, who diminish and demolish K & T's arguments one by one, and point out that they are simply a regurgitated list of previous arguments. I'll simply point to one source of comment: www.asktheatheists.com/778

    So I agree with you that indeed yes: I am a seeker asking questions,..... but not from unresolved issues, anger etc. I just have great curiosity about the whole religious issue, as well of course, about other social issues. Being long retired I have plenty of time to ponder religion's associated mysteries without the constraints of familial or societal expectations or the residual pressures of the RC indoctrinated fear and guilt of my childhood.

    1. Your reply is acknowledged with kindness ----Cecily.