Thursday 30 August 2018

CORK CELEBRATING TOM DENNIHAN'S DEPARTURE


I HAVE NEVER HAD AS MUCH CONTACT WITH CORK AND ITS CLERGY AND PEOPLE AS I HAVE HAD IN RECENT DAYS IN CONNECTION WITH TOM DEENIHAN'S DEPARTURE AND HIS TRANSFER TO THE DIOCESE OF MEATH.

The picture emerging is that Tom Deenihan has hurt many people among the clergy and in the context of schools in the diocese of Cork and Ross.

I am not at liberty to repeat my conversations with people as they spoke to me in confidence and fear retaliation if they are known to have talked to me.

The main gist of the conversations is in the area of Tom Deenihan using his power over clergy and schools in a very heavy-handed way.

This has led to serious divisions in clerical circles, in parishes and in schools in particular.

Some people are blaming their health issues on this division and tension.


Other folks, in Cork and otherwise, have expressed serious concern about issues surrounding Maynooth.



The Papal Nuncio has had several conservations with people in Cork and elsewhere.

He appears to be taking the complaints seriously and investigatiing any reports he has received.

----------------------------------------------------------------


MAN

Viganò Speaks: ‘I Am Not the Crow. I Want Only the Truth.’



Editor’s note: The following interview is between Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, now world-famous for his explosive testimony, and Aldo Maria Valli, the reporter with whom Viganò originally planned the publication of his allegations against Pope Francis and several high-ranking Vatican cardinals. For the adventure of how Archbishop Viganò’s report came to be, click here.

Monsignor, how are you doing?

Thanks be to God, I am doing very well, with great serenity and peace in my conscience – this is the reward of truth. The light always conquers the darkness. It cannot be suppressed, especially for the one who has faith. Therefore, I have much faith and hope for the Church.
How do you judge the various reactions to the publication of your memoir?

As you know, the reactions are contradictory. There are those who cannot stop looking for places to draw poison with which to destroy my credibility. Someone even wrote that I was hospitalized twice with compulsory treatment (TSO) for drug use. There are those who imagine conspiracies, political plots, plots of every sort, et cetera, but there are also many articles of appreciation, and I had the chance to see messages from priests and faithful people who are thanking me, because my testimony has been for them a glimmer of new hope for the Church.
What is your response to those who in these hours are objecting that you must have motives of personal rancor against the pope, and that it is for this reason that you decided to write and circulate your memoir?

Perhaps because I am naïve and accustomed to always think well of people – but above all I recognize that this is in fact a gift the Lord has given me – I have never had feelings of revenge or rancor in all these years when I have been put to the test by so many slanders and falsehoods spoken against me.
As I wrote at the beginning of my testimony, I have always believed that the hierarchy of the Church should have found within itself the resources necessary to heal all the corruption. I wrote this also in my letter to the three cardinals who were assigned by Pope Benedict to investigate the Vatileaks case, a letter that accompanied the report I gave them. “Many of you” – I wrote – “knew, but you remained silent. At least now that you have been given this assignment by Benedict you may have the courage to report accurately what has been revealed to you about so many situations of corruption.”
Why did you decide to publish and circulate your testimony?

I spoke because now more than ever, corruption has spread to the highest levels of the hierarchy of the Church. I ask the journalists: why are they not asking what happened to the cache of documents that, as we all saw, were delivered at Castel Gandolfo to Pope Francis from Pope Benedict? Was that all useless? It would have been enough to read my report and the transcript that was made of my deposition before the three cardinals charged with the investigation of the Vatileaks case (Julian Herranz, Jozef Tomko, and Salvatore De Giorgi) in order to begin some cleaning up in the Curia. But do you know what Cardinal Herranz said to me when I called him from Washington, concerned that so much time had passed since the investigation commission had been named by Pope Benedict and still no one had contacted me? We were speaking together, and I said to him, “Don’t you think that maybe I too have something to say concerning my letters, which were published without my knowledge?” He responded to me, “Ah, if you really want to.”
How would you respond to those who are saying that you are a “crow” or one of the “crows” at the origin of the Vatileaks case?

I am a crow? As you have seen with my testimony, I usually do things in the light of day! At the time, I was in Washington, and I definitely had other things to think about. On the other hand, it was always my habit to immerse myself completely in my new mission. This was what I did when I was sent to Nigeria: I no longer read the Italian news – so much so that after six years, when I was recalled to work in the Secretariat of State by St. John Paul II, it took me several months to re-orient myself, even though I had already worked in the Secretariat of State for eleven years from 1978 to 1989.
How would you respond to those who maintain that you were thrown out of the Governatorate, and that because of this you would have feelings of rancor and revenge?

As I have already said, rancor and revenge are not feelings that I hold. My resistance to leaving my post at the Governatorate was motivated by a deep sense of the injustice of a decision that I knew did not correspond to the will of Pope Benedict, of which he himself had told me. In order to throw me out, Cardinal Bertone had committed a series of grave abuses of his authority: he had dissolved the first commission of three cardinals whom Pope Benedict had nominated to investigate the grave accusations made by me as secretary-general and by the vice secretary-general, Monsignor Giorgio Corbellini, concerning the abuses committed by Monsignor Paolo Nicolini; in place of this cardinal commission he had created a disciplinary commission, altering in its constitution the institutional commission of the Governatorate; still prior to creating this commission, he had summoned me to tell me that the holy father had named me nuncio to Washington. Notwithstanding the fact that the disciplinary commission had decided on July 16, 2011 to dismiss Monsignor Paolo Nicolini, he abusively annulled this decision and prevented it from being published. By doing this, he blocked me from continuing the work of healing the corruption present in the management of the Governatorate.
How would you respond to those who speak of your “fixation” on becoming a cardinal and who maintain that you are now attacking the pope because you did not receive this honor?

I can affirm with all sincerity before God that I rejected the opportunity to become a cardinal. After my first letter to Cardinal Bertone, which I sent to Pope Benedict so that he could do whatever he thought best, Pope Benedict summoned me and received me in an audience on April 4, 2011, and he immediately spoke these words to me: “I believe that the assignment in which you can best serve the Holy See is as the president of the Prefecture for Economic Affairs in place of Cardinal Velasio De Paolis.” I thanked the pope for the confidence he had shown me, and I added, “Holy Father, why don’t you wait six months or a year? Because, if you promote me right now, the team that has had faith in me and worked to remedy the situation in the Governatorate will be immediately dispersed and persecuted (as in fact happened).
I also added another argument. Given that Cardinal De Paolis had only recently been appointed to deal with the delicate situation of the Legionaries of Christ (Cardinal De Paolis had consulted me before accepting this assignment), I said to the pope that it would be better if he would continue to have an institutional position that would give greater authority to him as a person and thus to his action with the Legionaries. At the end of the audience, Pope Benedict said to me once more: “I however remain of the opinion that the position in which you can best serve the Holy See is as president of the Prefecture for Economic Affairs.” Cardinal Re can confirm this story. Thus, I renounced being made a cardinal for the good of the Church.
How would you respond to those who would draw your family into this matter by speaking of the “saga” under the banner of having huge economic interests?

On March 20, 2013, my siblings had prepared a statement for the press, whose publication I opposed so as to avoid involving the entire family. Because the accusation of my brother Lorenzo is now being repeated – namely, that I lied to Pope Benedict by writing to him asking for a leave of absence to take care of my sick brother – I have decided to make this communiqué public. Upon reading it, it becomes evident that I felt a serious moral responsibility to take care of and protect my brother.
(Whoever is interested to delve deeper into this last point may read here the text of the communiqué, which was redacted in March 2013 by several of Viganò’s siblings in his defense.)
This interview was translated by Giuseppe Pellegrino. The original Italian can be found at Aldo Maria Valli’s website.

---------------------------------------------------------------------


THE PLACE OF PENANCE THAT WASHINGTON DIOCESE HAVE BOUGHT FOR MC CARRICK TO LIVE IN!!!



COMMENTS FROM TWO PEOPLE IN WASHINGTON

97 comments:

  1. "I am not at liberty to repeat my conversations with people as they spoke to me in confidence... "

    Don't flatter yourself, Bp Pat.

    ReplyDelete
  2. BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! 🐑

    HAH! HAH! HAH! HAH! 😅

    See sheep? What these shepherds think of you?

    You really couldn't make up this shit. 😅

    A parasitical Roman Catholic clergy SCREWS its laity, over and over, in more ways than one (wink-wink, nudge-nudge), and STILL, the braindead asses continue to allow these parasites to sponge off them.

    Enjoy your penance, McCarrick. And while yer sufferin' in thon wee hovel, have a long bellylaugh, every day, at the utter fools who financed your 'pentitential' last few years on this planet. 😆

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Brendan. Do you ever feel guilty about destroying and using people you called friends? Hickey, Sheehan, Connolly, Gannon, McElroy, Byrne, Jones, Moriarty etc.

    You are the common denominator in all of the drama. Karma will come back around for you Marshall...just you wait and see :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you were destroyed by Marshall you need your head examined, that guys a cuck.

      Delete
    2. Whats a cuck?

      Delete
    3. A cuck is an enemy of the alt-right / trads and they generally have low T and see everything through a Freudian lens.

      Delete
    4. He is a cunning cuck. Someone told me recently what he did to his “friends”. It made me feel sick. The truth will come out. Brendan Marshall you are a vile human being for what you did!

      Delete
    5. He is not a fashy goy.

      Delete
  4. https://www.catholicbishops.ie/2018/08/30/media-information-for-the-episcopal-ordination-of-canon-tom-deenihan-as-the-new-bishop-of-meath/

    ReplyDelete
  5. Many who have encountered Deenihan know he is a nasty malicious piece of work. This must be something the Hierarchy wants. They desire a pitbull, so they have gone down to the pitts and they will get some bull. Unbelievable!

    ReplyDelete
  6. If that is penance I would love to see their idea of indulgence!

    ReplyDelete
  7. In other jurisdictions, he would be heading for prison. My understanding is that there are very serious claims of abuse of minors that took place, but the statute of limitations means that he will not have to answer them. That is a shame. He should face justice, and answer for his crimes / behaviour, at any age, and at any distance of time. Maybe there will be a special place for him in Purgatory where he can spend a long time before he is admitted to Heaven. That is if your theology still extends to those rather contrived notions ! Seriously, however, until justice is done, the situation is not healed, and having McCorrick living out his days in comfort masquerading as prayer and penance, is a travesty of justice and does little or nothing to heal and bring resolution and peace to those who have been harmed, and to the Church in general.

    ReplyDelete
  8. A question for Bishop Pat,
    As it is your practice to investigate claims against clergy before publishing details, I want to ask you about comments made regarding a priest in the UK some months ago. I recall over several blogs, comments about the FSSP priest Fr Armand de Malleray alluded to a relationship he was supposedly having with a young woman in London. I know several people who commented later on this subject, and sent messages that you never published. Did Fr de Malleray/someone he knows, contact you denying the rumours?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Were these the comments also alluding to rumours of negotiations between the said priest and Cardinal Nichols, to establish a traditional parish in London? If so, I remember reading them at the time and thinking how unlikely it was, as Nichols has never welcomed Traditional types to the Diocese.

      Nevertheless, I think the question raised above needs answering, especially if we are to believe your sources, Pat

      Delete
    2. Maybe but he certainly has plenty of the usual types in Westminster.

      Delete
    3. Nichols is a very strange fish. He has a devious mind which is why he's climbed to the top no doubt. Some of his clerical appointments are bizzare and he certainly keeps his enemies very close. He has a tendency to reward Queens with good parishes and he's like Dermo in that regard. He has a small cabal around him of bitchy queens whom he's fully aware of, some of whom are ex Anglican single Vicars. Some of these ex Anglicans now control the running of Allen Hall, the diocesan Seminary. The small cabal and clique use their influence to get their friends into cushy parishes in some millionaire parts of London, the Cathedral is controlled by one. All jobs for the girls and Vincent is happy that none of these precious madams are any threat to him, his Secretary and VG included.

      Delete
    4. You seem bitter. Did you not get the parish that you wanted?

      Delete
    5. Bitter or not, 13:11 certainly hits the nail on the head regarding Westminster - all instantly recognizable.

      Delete
    6. @14.12 Sorry to burst your bubble and shatter your illusion that I'm bitter and somehow part of Westminster, far from it. I have priest friends in the diocese, yes priests do actually have friends. You don't have to be a Priest of a particular diocese in order to have an informed opinion of it. I hope that answers your cynacism. Westminster many will enlighten you from inside and outside is being dominated by a cabal in which his Eminence is fully aware. Cast a Look at those in key curia positions and plum parishes. When Vincent wines and dines his curia for one day next week at Waxwell Farm the gin and girlie giggles will be in plentiful supply. Vinny will be happy with such behaviour as long as they don't challenge him because Vinny hates challenge.

      Delete
    7. @13.11 The biggest mistake was allowing these ex Anglican clergy to get a foot in the door of Westminister. It's true that Murphy O'Connor and now Nichols have allowed them top positions in the diocese. The Seminary and Cathedral are only a few examples. Vincent appointed an ex Vicar to be Dean (VF) of an area in London a few years back. Parishioners of the area said at the time the guy was so obviously camp and gay he may as well have had it tattooed on his forehead.

      Delete
    8. @13.11 That's a fair analysis of Westminster, I couldn't agree more. Murphy O'Connor and Nichols usually banished clergy they disliked to Hertfordshire or Middlesex. Nichols could be in big cover up trouble from an Australian Seminarian who was in the Beda College Rome with a Westminster Seminarian.
      He is going to speak out about a cover up by Nichols and his then Auxiliary Alan Hopes the current Bishop of East Anglia.
      Alan Hopes - wait for it - is an ex Anglican Vicar, the first ex Anglican in Westminster to be made a Catholic Bishop. You couldn't make it up.

      Delete
    9. Pat, did you ever hear from Fr Armand de Malleray?

      Delete
    10. @13:11 your points are definitely valid, as I too have connections in Westminster who express similar feelings, but Fr Armand de Malleray is definitely not a 'Queeny' type, in fact far from it. It is that which makes these suggestions of a relationship more credible.

      Delete
    11. Did this priest ever contact you about the comments made weeks ago, Pat? I know people who asked you this question previously and found their comments were never published.

      Delete
    12. @18.14 My post @ 13.11 did not refer to a Fr de Malleray, I have no knowledge of him. My post is totally unconnected to what you are alleging.

      Delete
    13. @17:36. What's the story with the Australian?

      Delete
    14. Bishop Pat,
      To believe the claims you make, we also ask that you answer questions posed to you regarding their credibility. Will you at least tell us whether Fr DeMalleray ever contacted you regarding the claims made on here a few weeks ago?

      Delete
    15. 21:01 Mind your own business! If this French priest wants to sleep with the young woman, that is their choice and entitlement to do so. Both are consenting adults, so jog on!

      Delete
  9. About one year ago I commented to some friends that leading up to WMOF and with the visit of Pope Francis, we would have an avalanche of news items re: Church abuse scandals, the cover up of scandals, repeating of abuse horror stories, voices raging against the Catholic Church and much negativity to the point where the only narrative that would dominate our lives would be that the Church is entirely responsible for all abuses, wrongs and ills of society. As a committed Catholic, I cannot deny much of this but I must also state that in the 70's when my parents were struggling to survive with a large family and on the death of my father at a young age, the only people to truly care (apart from kind relatives and neighnours) were the local clergy, religious sisters and the religious brothers at the school I attended. Without their practical support and kindness, we would have found life very difficult. I continued in my life to witness similar kindness from many priests and religious. I saw the gospel of Christ lived and embraced by many, many Church personnel. I wholeheartedly agree that when we allow institutions have absolute, unquestioned and unchallenged power, it will corrupt. We now know the havoc, pain and hurt of this corrupted power. Yet, despite my abhorrence at the scandals of all kinds within the Church, I remain because I want to see the "essence" of the gospel proclaimed, lived and upheld by the people of God. I condemn all abuse, I speak against it from my platform, but I also am very aware of the quietly lived lives of wonderful kindness, care and compassion which I witness in many priests and religious. We need to acknoledge those who, because of their unwavering fidelity to God and who truly embrace the gospel of Christ, are lighhts in this time of darkness for the Church. I take immense inspiration from Pope Francis's visit when he stood with Br. Kevin among the poor, the broken and homeless. I hope that the Church I belong to will emulate this justice, love and compassion. It's where I now want to belong and to do what I can in my community to keep this vision vibrant. While I accept all legitimate criticisms of a Church that is corrupt and lacking truthful leadership, I also desire for genuine renewal which is truly of Christ. All the critics have legitimacy but we must also see the gospel goodness that's heroically lived by many.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MourneManMichael31 August 2018 at 12:32

      Anon@ 11:30: A very fair comment, and one we'd do well to remember when so much of the blog focuses on the dark side of clerical behaviour. Bear in mind too the altruistic ethical behaviour of many 'non believers' in religion who follow the Golden Rule without any aspiration or imperative towards 'reward', simply because evolution has imprinted ethical cooperation very deeply into the human psyche. That trait strongly persists despite the aberrant behaviour of the many whose negative actions tend to hog the limeligh.

      Delete
  10. 11:30: '...when my parents were STRUGGLING to survive with a LARGE family and on the death of my father at a young age...'?

    I'm sorry your father died in those (finanancially?) constraining circumstances. And I presume his early death tightened these constraints.

    But did it never cross your mind that the institutional Church (which you rightly praise through the caring of local clergy and of religious) perhaps bore fundamental responsibility for your family's financial difficulties by a moral teaching that forbids contraception and actually encourages families to be large?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 11.59: Magna, I understand your point but irrespective of a large family, which was the norm then, my parents loved each of us uniquely and gave us wonderful family togetherness which has stood the test of time and challenges. Rather than look for the negatives, I always see the positives. Despite not having much materially, I appreciate the small blessings of everyday, whereas today children seem to "get" and "have" all they desire materily. The values of sharing, truth, justice, gratitude, prayer, fidelity to God, Church every Sunday - all were important in my family life and have influenced me hugely. Though I am deeply saddened at the present scandals, I always seek to do what is best and find what is best within my faith community. I could walk away as I've been tempted to do, but my faith community - Catholic - in all its fragility, sinfulness and imperfections- matters to me. I know I can renew by staying. My parents never sought excuses not to be faithfil to the living out of their Christian faith, so I am grateful for their legacy to me.

      Delete
    2. Mad Magna at 11:59

      Polly get a grip,the post was praising how much he and his family was supported by the Church and the clergy and you say it was right to do so. Then you go and spoil it all by blaming Our Holy Mother The Church for her moral teaching, as if to blame her for the poor family's difficulties you're incorrigible! Anyway love and prayers B. Eviva Maria!


      Delete
    3. Barking B., the institutional Church WAS, in my opinion, fundamentally responsible for that family's (and other families') money worries, through dogmatic teaching on artificial contraception, which, for generations, led to large numbers of children, poverty, and the premature aging and death of countless women through serial child birth.

      An unpleasant truth about institutional Roman Catholicism, but a truth nonetheless.😆

      Delete
    4. MAD MAGNA a t22:

      Polly you're always going on about your opinion, but your opinion is not correct. It stems from your hatred of The Holy Church and it's teachings. However I know that it's an unpleasant truth for you, but many people do not agree with you and love our Holy Faith and that is the truth in my opinion. Love and prayers B. Eviva Maria!

      Delete
    5. Barking B., the 'teaching' of successive magisteria of that evil institution you worship rather than Christ was that it was morally acceptable to kill one's enemy by execution. Even though this 'teaching' was directly and gravely contrary to the clear and authentic teaching of Jesus, it was upheld until very recently, when it was definitively revoked by Pope Francis. What, then, was this 'teaching' if not mere, centuries-old opinion? 😅

      You worship a whore, Barking B. . And her stink grows stronger almost by the day now. 😆

      Delete
    6. Mad Magna at 09:12

      Barking Polly, unlike you I do worship Our Lord Jesus Christ and follow the teachings of the Holy Church that he Himself instituted. As an atheist you will never understand as you do not possess the wonderful gift of FAITH. I do not agree with the present pope on quite a lot of his pronouncements which run contrary to The Magesterium of The Church.

      The only whore you worship is yourself and your erroneous opinions and the stink from your foul mouth grows stronger by your comments every day. Love and prayers B. Eviva Maria!

      Delete
  11. Deenihan is eager to make changes when he gets his paws on Meath. He wants a new VG and someone who will basically say yes to everything he says. It's also partly down to settling scores with some in Meath who've crossed him in the past. What is more disturbing is that he will not be leaving Cork as such, he fully intends being back there at every opportunity whilst Buckley is holding the reins. There are a few priests in Meath who must be feeling uneasy at present over the prospect of getting their marching orders from this new Hog.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I hate Church Militant but it claims Cardinal Donald “Donna” Wuerl fleeing to Rome to avoid US arrest for abuse cover-up.

    https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-wuerl-fleeing-to-rome-to-avoid-u.s.-arrest-for-abuse-cover-up?utm_source=LifeSiteNews.com&utm_campaign=a5241b4acf-Catholic_8_30_2018&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_12387f0e3e-a5241b4acf-402167169

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wuerl is in full denial mode.

      Delete
  13. Pat have You decided which charity you will be donating money to when Eamon Martin takes you to Court. St Josephs young priests society always needs funds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have not replied to Amy's letter as of yet.

      When I do I will publish my reply here.

      Delete
    2. No need to waste a stamp, Bp Pat, they'll read the blog everyday like the rest of us.

      Delete
    3. He doesn’t deserve a reply Pat..let him sue away...it will just backfire on him.

      Delete
    4. What about just sending an acknowledgement then ignoring it, the way bishops do when people complain their children are being sexually abused?

      Delete
    5. The main defences to defamation actions in NI are the following (as summarized in the Consultation Paper on Defamation Law in Northern Ireland published by the NI Law Commission in 2014 (the “Paper”)). Justification: the defendant proves what he said was true or substantially true. Honest Comment: the defendant proves that he expressed a reasonable comment/opinion rather than an assertion of fact. “The essence of the defence is that reasonable members of the audience for the publication can appreciate that what has been published is “merely” the view of the publisher.” (Section 2.17 of the Paper.) And finally, Responsible Publication: the defendant proves he acted responsibly in preparing the publication on a matter of public interest. “…responsible publication on a matter of public interest …[is a defence that] was developed by…[the] House of Lords… in the case of Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd. It recognised that, in the democratic polity, it is important to accept that despite best endeavours, false statements of fact – or at least statements that cannot be proven to be true - may sometimes be published. The defence provides that where the subject matter of the publication is a matter of public interest, and the publisher has acted responsibly in preparing the publication no liability in defamation will ensue.” (Section 2.18 of the Paper.) A defendant could, of course, claim all defences in the alternative and leave the decision to the jury which, one assumes, would need to exclude any person who by reason of religion affiliation might be deemed to be sympathetic to an ecclesiastical claimant. Given the Ryan Report, the Murphy Report, the Report of the PA Grand Jury, and numerous other reports there would seem to be a wealth of evidence regarding public interest. For that reason, among others, one wonders how probable it is that the matter will arrive in court where the defendant would have the right to call witnesses and to cross-examine the claimant thereby, presumably, attracting the attention of the national and international press. Sometimes libel actions have unintended consequences, as once discovered by a late celebrity of this island.

      Delete
    6. Refer the matter to Cardinal Sarah, Bp Pat.

      Delete
  14. You can tell a lot about a Pope from the company he keeps: Coccopalmerio, Paglia, McCarrick, Wuerl, Farrell, Tobin, Cupich etc...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They got him elected, he is fully owned by such men who use seminaries and young clergy as their harems.

      Delete
  15. Just shows the complete lack of common sense or lack of investigative skills of those entrusted with appointing bishops. It's no longer enough to rely on the testimony of a few biased prelates. Did the nuncio consult priests and parishioners in C&R? Classmates from Maynooth? If a robust investigation was made a more balanced picture of the candidate would emerge. The laity and priests of a diocese should have much more say in appointing their bishop anyway.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why does nobody get it? The hierarchy are not interested in anybody's opinion but their own. The reason they don't consult anyone is they don't want to!

      Delete
  16. 13.16 The Laity and the Priests have a say in who the new Bishop should be as everyone is invited to write to Archbishop Okolo Apostolic Nunciture 183 Navan Road Dublin 7. There are many vacant dioceses in our home land here in Ireland.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 13:50 well it’s too fuckin late now - isn’t it?? Deenihan will be ordained a bishop and they will rue the day in Meath. Nuncio making phone calls my arse! It’s happening on Sunday lads. And you know what? Yiz fuckin deserve everything that’s coming because ye are all spineless.

      Delete
    2. 13.50

      The priests and laity may be asked as a or exercise.

      Their voice means 0%

      Delete
    3. That's what I thought. Any church official receives a concern or complaint and either ignores it or shows an apparent concern. It's then shredded.
      Business as usual...

      Delete
    4. 19:37, then STOP giving these bone-idle, work-shy bastardos your money. 😠

      If they want to live as gentlemen-of-leisure (and the majority of them do), then allow them to do so...but at THEIR expense, not yours. 😆

      Delete
    5. Lol Magna I last gave them money in 1992 and have since lived at their expense for 18 months as a novice in a religious order. My tone didn't come across. 19:37

      Delete
  17. He’s only 51. So will have to be endured for a long time.
    Why didn’t u publish whatever you had on him ???
    What happened to the rent boy/ D M saga ?????
    And what has Eamon done about the Monsterboice Pp ????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They have necks like a jockeys bo......

      Delete
    2. 19.10: Say the word Pat -"bollocks"...Funny, every time I see your neck that very word comes instantly to mind!! Always.

      Delete
  18. A new low. Deenihan is a thug and a bully.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thugees are quite popular with some gays, but they're usually black.

      Delete
  19. In 1980s Maynooth, where there was no shortage of pushy and bombastic seminarians, Deenihan took the biscuit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Probably a dominant male bottom.

      Delete
  20. Lots of room for visiting nephews in the penitential palace. Even in retirement the disgusting old goat had seminarian and priest secretaries. McCarrick's "type" is tall, slim and intelligent, by all accounts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wonder what Amy's type is?

      Delete
  21. Darcy is boasting in the Fermanagh Herald that he was on the organising committee for the 1979 papal visit. Is this true and why the need to mention it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @18.14 He has OPSS. Obsessive Publicity Seeking Syndrome.

      Delete
    2. ... and BD (brewers droop).

      Delete
    3. Why such obvious hatred for Fr Brian D'Arcy? (Hatred or jealousy, I can't make up my mind which it may be.)

      And please don't tell me that, underneath it all, you REALLY love him.😆

      Delete
    4. I actually think he's a very lovable fellow, and can't figure out why he's so hated by some here.

      Delete
  22. Oh get over yourself 18.14...your jealousy shows up every time you mention Brian Darcy name.
    Grow up.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Shocking to see a man fawn in public over a man he knows to be a sex abuser under sanctions, but that is exactly what Vigano does here from 36.55: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aw4j5sAT1A8

    ReplyDelete
  24. Can anyone confirm if Fr Cairan Dallat ( the original Dalriada Dick) actually spoke at the WMOF.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't worry, Bp Pat, will find out what the twat said.

      Delete
  25. Deenihan - against the expectations of many priests in C & R and across the wider country - is going to Meath because a small group of bishops see him as the warrior to defend Catholic schools. After the loss of recent referenda these bishops (who do not include Diarmuid Martin) fear that the next "assault" (their language} will be on the distinct Catholic ethos in Catholic schools. They needed him in a diocese close to Dublin and with the westward expansion of the city Meath is practically in the suburbs of Dublin.

    Not the sharpest knife in the drawer, in fact the first Irish Catholic bishop to be without an undergrad degree [BA or BSc] but did the Sem course in Maynooth, his defence of education strikes some as odd. But he's a sharp set of elbows and has muscled into mitred class.

    He'll be a pliable old biddy for some of the stronger voices in the hierarchy.

    All this suggests they've got the wrong analysis of the Irish church, the wrong man to do this job and arguably the wrong place from which to launch this defence.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You make a lot of sense, and as you summed up, all so wrong.

      Delete
    2. Spot on 19:24! And just watch now as Catholic education goes down the tubes real fast!

      You actually couldn’t make it up these idiots are so bad. How anyone ever thought making someone of Deenihan’s character and calibre a bishop is staggering!

      The Irish Church is in for extremely meagre and miserable times. Maybe we deserve it? God help us all.

      Delete
    3. Has Horny Andy X any role in Sunday’s ceremony in Mullingar?

      Delete
    4. Remember the guy in Poland whose ordination as a bishop was called off at the last minute? Well there is no chance of that happening in Meath on Sunday. So shut the f*** up and suck it up bitches.

      Uncle Tom’s reign will be long and Timmy B is next for a mitre. Great to see these young men rising high as they well deserve. The future of the Irish Church is secure and bright and all shiny.

      Hallelu- yaa! Hallelu-yee!

      Delete
    5. 19:24 Michael Drumm would be the man to promote the churches’ role in education. Comparisons are odious but he has everything lacking in TD.

      Delete
    6. HAX, after the coronation with the precious mitre, will be making an entrance, wearing only a g-string - pole vaulting up the central aisle using the new bishop’s crozier - and then presenting it to him, along with the crozier. I tell you Salome’s dance will be as nothing. Nothing!

      Delete
  26. @17.36 I think you refer to the case of Cardinal Nichols and the Beda College. The Australian Seminarian involved is now saying that he broke the nose of a Westminster Seminarian (who Nichols ordained 2 years ago). The Westminster guy 'came on to him' whilst very drunk and after breaking his nose he fell down some stairs. The Australian was dismissed and Nichols promised his own Seminarian involved to sign a document not to sue the Australian, the Beda or Westminster as the story would OUT. In exchange the Westminister guy would stay quiet and get Ordained for cooperating. This stinks to high heaven. The Westminister gut (an ex Anglican) was then held back a further year at the Beda because he was deemed so unsuitable by the Beda Rector, Mgr R Strange. Vincent continued to Ordain this man.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Who is the Westminster Seminarian now ordained? Is he in banished Hertfordshire?

    ReplyDelete
  28. A document can be produced stating Vincent's reservations in relation to the Seminarian's future @ 19.52. Letters were written about the Seminarian to Mgr O'Toole now the Bishop of Plymouth. In the document the Cardinal himself acknowledged he saw the complaints for himself. The Cardinal proceeded to Ordination despite this. A copy of this document can be made available to you Bishop Pat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. B/S Msgr O'Toole was rector in Allen Hall and the seminarian was in the Beda. Not a chance this post is true

      Delete
    2. @23.36 It's obvious you are not aware of the facts. The Seminarian was sent to Allen Hall from the Beda for a short time during O'Toole's time as Rector. No point calling the story untrue when you don't know the full story. The document in my possession names O'Toole and others. What evidence can you provide? Tell us.

      Delete
    3. I know the seminarian who you are talking about and he was NEVER sent to Allen Hall from the Beda.

      Delete
  29. 19:24. Obviously intelligence and qualifications no longer count for much. The irony is that Fr David O'Hanlon and his new bishop were contemporaries at Maynooth. The former did brilliantly in his multiple degrees in classics, theology and patristics.

    ReplyDelete
  30. @21.42 Give me a pastoral heart any day. A care for your priests and concern for the laity far outweigh the degrees and titles which mean little to people in the pew. When did multiple degrees in classics and patristics wipe the tear from the widows eye? Get into the real world ffs.

    ReplyDelete
  31. O'Hanlon not a people person in a very different way. Anyways I admit to being clueless when it comes to discerning what might make someone suitable for a Bishopric. Deenihan may have pulled on a mask because of the bad sqint of the eye and the brutishly ugly looks but he certainly enveloped and embraced the nasty personae.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Brady still making appointments. What all on this blog and throughout the world of the Borg don't understand, once announced as a bishop in the putrid world of Institutional Catholicism, you are a bishop...the ceremony is only the icing on the shitcake...

    ReplyDelete
  33. 23.16: And you Mulvihill appear out of your cesspit to s**t and p**s your vulgarity, "caca" and idiocy all over everyone. You should never have been ordained. You've spent your life as a very disgruntled, sad, bitter, confused man.

    ReplyDelete