Friday 2 November 2018

Hit the pope where it hurts

Milo Yiannopoulos THE SPECTATOR


Of all the rich, out-of-touch, globalist left-wing institutions, the Catholic Church is the most corrupt and depraved. Its primary sickness is something we’ve all known for years: it’s too gay. As a Catholic who struggles with the occasional homosexual urge, I’ve watched in horror as this pink rot in the clerisy has torn the Bride of Christ apart.
This year’s ‘summer of shame’ is the result of gay crimes, performed by gay men in service of other gay men, concerning assaults overwhelmingly performed by men on young boys and a debased culture of gay orgies in seminaries.
There’s a political dimension, obviously. You’ll hear people say that the crisis has tainted Left and Right equally, but it’s not true
A lot of gays in the Church are doctrinally conservative, favoring traditional worship like the Latin Mass. Perhaps it’s the gold embroidery, or maybe they feel at home looking at the back of another man’s head. But it’s the Left which has presided over the most rapid moral decay, and not those harmless, nostalgic old queens, because it’s the left-wing ‘lavender mafia’ that has tainted the Church with the stench of cover-up.
The worst offenders have been the Church’s social justice warriors: predominately gay left-wing activist bishops trying to overturn Church teaching on everything from gay marriage to divorce. And the worst offender of all? Pope Francis, who has been a friend to just about any abusive priest, no matter how reprehensible their actions, provided they are sufficiently left-wing—and utterly obedient to him.
Francis hasn’t just looked the other way, like John Paul II, or, like Benedict XVI, been incapable of standing up to monsters. He has actively promoted people accused of sex crimes, such as Theodore McCarrick, a close ally of Francis accused of molesting boys as young as 11. Francis reinstated McCarrick after Benedict had banned him from public appearances and made him his envoy to China, restoring his access to seminarians.
In part, that’s because McCarrick was a good fundraiser. He helped to establish a Papal Foundation whose assets have grown to over $200 million. When that foundation, maintained by wealthy Americans, was hit up for an unusually vast grant last year and the board hesitated, Francis vindictively cancelled their annual audience with him. SJWs are nothing if not petty.
They’re also liars and bullies. One of the pope’s cronies has hinted that anyone who criticises the pope should be treated as though they had physically assaulted him—the punishment for which is excommunication. Conflating words with violence is straight out of the Black Lives Matter playbook.
On the one hand, it means someone who says something you don’t like deserves to be treated as a violent criminal. Conversely, when you smash a bike lock across their skull, you’ve simply exercised your right to free speech! Brilliant.
How has the world’s press responded to these outrages? By covering for Francis, of course, because the pope says the right things about climate change and migrants and loves to needle Donald Trump. American reporters practically soiled themselves when Francis, in a painfully transparent stunt, washed the feet of a Muslim migrant and insisted that Muslims and Christians worship the same God. (We don’t.)
You can imagine the panic in newsrooms when a scandal erupts and it looks like all the bad guys are left-wing homos whose Google results show a bunch of speeches about toxic masculinity and racial justice. Whatever can be published to distract attention is hastily cobbled together.
Take this New York Times headline from August: ‘Francis Takes High Road As Conservatives Pounce, Taking Criticisms Public.’ No mention of Pope Francis being accused ofprotecting someone who had sex with children.
Journalists have leapt to protect the reputation of a pope perceived as a leftist, and to save the feelings of the gay lobby, which hates it when gays are talked about honestly in public as the promiscuous, low-income, drug-taking, reckless, and unhappy peoplewe (statistically) are.
In the myth-building period of his papacy, the Washington Post ran headlines like: ‘How Pope Francis Can Cleanse The Far-Right Rot From The Catholic Church.’ Ha! That aged well. Now he’s on the ropes. Even far-left Der Spiegelran a bold cover last month with the headline THOU SHALT NOT LIE, next to a photo of Francis. Eventually, once enough children have been molested, even journalists are forced to tell the truth.
One of the pope’s only responses to the crisis has been to invite Bono for tea, so the singer could tell journalists how ‘aghast’ the pope was at the allegations against him. That’s an interesting choice of words, until you realise Francis is a bog-standard social justice warrior who always doubles down on his mistakes and who presents his victims as the true aggressors. Bono, by the way, once dedicated a song to his ‘old friend’ McCarrick during a gig. That song include the words: ‘I have spoke with the tongue of angels/I have held the hand of a devil/It was warm in the night/I was cold as a stone/But I still haven’t found/What I’m looking for.’ Whoops! Awkward.
Scrubbing the effeminate, dishonest, disreputable and malevolent from the Church hierarchy will make way for a rehabilitation of healthy manhood and a strong Catholicism that returns to its roots. Ordinary churchgoers hate all the hippy-dippy crap. They come to worship Almighty God.
Unfortunately, Team Francis still hasn’t got the message. So the best thing for us to do is stop funding Catholic organisations that don’t do good Catholic work. At least one bishop-endorsed, laity-funded group in the US has donated to Planned Parenthood. How did that even happen?
Stop giving these people your money. And stop attending churches overseen by bishops who cover up for abusers. If Team Francis won’t listen to their consciences, perhaps their minds will be focused by bailiffs at the door instead. It’s the only thing these Marxist thugs in birettas understand.

69 comments:

  1. The overly-gay aspect of seminaries has grown exponentially since the church started training people to be directors of formation. These deans are sent to the USA and a year later are (pseudo)-psychologists.

    We'd all be better off if that course was scrapped and Deans were simply good priests behaving fraternally with fellow catholics.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maynooth is simply a place where Truth is replaced with rumour and gossip. If you can control the discourse you will be successful. The better you gossip the better you play the game.

      Delete
  2. What a load of absolute horseshite.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As a long-time reader of The Spectator and a sort of fan of Milo, I agree that this is absolute horseshite.

      Delete
    2. Re/the Milo offering... Not his finest moment.. Very weak piece which simply doesn't work as a piece of "serious" journalism. The writing's on the wall...

      Delete
  3. The Guardian does have other competent and worthwhile journalists though who write succinct and accurate copy.
    So no need to despair just yet ..

    ReplyDelete
  4. I had to check The Spectator that they really had given space to this creature. Did I once read he was a protege of Damian Thompson? That figures, and I doubt either rates too highly on the heterosexual front, if you catch my drift. In fact I seem to recall he contracted a gay marriage himself, so what the hell is he on about? Now he is on a bizarre road trip with Anne Coulter if you can get your head round that. It occurs to me that Milo is a more flamboyant representative of the mendacious gay culture he affects to deplore in the clergy, though only the liberal leftie types incur his ire and scorn. I infer he is an admirer of Old Mother Burke as shares the longing of many an eccentric old queen for a manly type of Catholic, though ideally not one who would go so far as to lie with a woman - just claiming to be straight would be taking things quite far enough. He might consider setting a more credible example of the type he extols. Way to go, Milo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I blame women sometimes, e.g., who on earth would be desperate enough to marry that little Thompson creep?

      He mentioned his “two children” once in his former Telegraph blog, and fumed when I commented, “stepchildren, surely.”

      As if that little twerp could dip his wick. LOL!

      Delete
    2. But ALL the people who fret and fume about the gayness of the clergy are gay themselves.

      Delete
    3. Tell that to Fr Marsden.

      Delete
  5. Thank you, Milo. Searingly accurate and truthful - and will therefore be hard for some to stomach. Jesus approved of ALL behaviour, don't you know, except over- fishing the Sea of Galilee, lighting fires on the beach ( because of global warming), employing men on your fishing boat ( because that's capitalism ) rather than making them shareholders, wearing prayer shawls with tassels ( because that's clerical garb), worshipping in synagogues and temples ( because that's sooo institutional), telling samaritans they worshipped what they didn't know ( because all religions are equal and that's a hate crime and He would need to check his jewish privilege!), fasting ( because that's just psychologically disturbed) and certainly not voluntarily allowing Himself to be tortured and brutally executed just to appease His rigid father ( because He was His own person who shouldn't be burdened with His old man's hang-ups). But men claiming to be really women or men sodomising other men He was really cool about because god is luv, man and the road is narrow, sorry, I mean really wide, and there is no hell and His followers don't have to drink from His cup and He might not have said any of this anyway as there were no tape recorders in those days - according to the chief Jesuit. Forget all that, "male and female He created them stuff". That Bible is pure hate-speech and needs to be banned.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @ 1.50.
      Not to be taken seriously obviously....

      Delete
    2. 11.41, it would appear, rather, that that is what many priests and bishops today "believe."

      Delete
    3. Oh, dear, 01:50! That's an enormous bubble you're in. (All the better to burst, though. 😆)

      You've been taking Jesus a little too seriously. It's not healthy, and leads to a confection of truths, half-truths, and nonsense.

      He didn't always mean what he actually said, y'know.

      Delete
    4. I'm sure telling yourself that is how you get through. Jesus lays the truth before you: you either accept it or reject it.
      I don't think I should follow you; you don't have the message of eternal life.
      Was your father truly and lovingly present in your life? The Lord can restore to you the years which the locusts have eaten. Just ask.

      Delete
    5. Before anyone can accept or reject anything, they must know what is before them, 14:37. Even Jesus' immediate disciples couldn't always understand his words. Which, of course, opens the door to biblical hermenutics.

      If you know what Jesus precisely and comprehensively taught (and your post suggests it), then you, sir or madam, stand alone in the spotlight of perfect metaphysics.

      What, I think, you propose acceptance of are really your personal preferences: your private hermeneutics. Unfortunately for you, these don't apperar to have a biblical imprimatur (like much the institutional Church taught down its long and deviant centuries.

      As for my 'father' (Human? Divine? Or both?), I had, for most of my life never experienced my so-called 'heavenly Father' as either generous or loving. Why? Because this is not the God favoured by an institution, the Roman Catholic Church, which relied heavily on controlling and manipulating its members. And a loving, generous and merciful God just wouldn't have enabled the Church to achieve these things. Not frightening enough.

      Delete
  6. Bishop Pat, you seem to me to be a man deeply (DEEPLY) conflicted about his homosexuality, which is why you repeatedly attack the institutional Church from this angle.

    There have always been queers in the Church (some more flaming than others), so their presence is scarcely a novelty. In this case, what is driving you, Bishop P. ? I, too, HATE the institutional Church. In fact, I have such low regard for Roman Catholoic priesthood, that if ever I came across one of theses toerags set on fire by a disgruntled parishoner, I'd have to be persuaded to waste bodily fluid (piss) on such a very low form of human 'caca'. 😆

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Obviously a charming example @ 4.19 of Magna's "charity"...

      Delete
    2. Marius Carta hahaha

      Delete
    3. Mad Magna Caca at 04:19!!!!

      You can see what the bold Magna's "centered prayer" has done for her. It has her up posting her usual caca at 4:15am full of the gargle and her usual christian charity disgusting language and hate. What a toerag the very lowest form of human caca on the road to perdition. Evviva Maria!

      Delete
    4. 04.19: Maggie, you're drinking too much of your own caca. Disgusting and ugly. What a stench you are!

      Delete
    5. Thank you for those 'loving' words, Barking Hellarmine. 'Toerag'? 'Very lowest form of human caca'?

      If I'm truly on the road to perdition, then you're walking along with me, since your behaviour on this blog mirrors my own. (Mirrors my own, because you lack the intelligence and imagination to be creative and novel. 😅)

      Delete
    6. Mad Magna Caca aka Granny Grammar & Great Pedantic Bore at 15:39

      Oh! Polly, you poor lost soul, I do not mirror you in any way I just send your own insults back to you. I don't stay up all night on the gargle spewing vitriolic insults. I have worked all my life and paid my own way, while you are a workshy lazy parasite even your so superior education that you never stop going on about was paid for by the tax payer, what a waste of money. I worked for forty years in the Social Welfare Dept. and had to deal with people like you who will neither work nor want. I only wish you'd been at my desk I'd have sanctioned you and made sure you got up off your arse and got a job. So no I do not mirror you in any way and I have remained faithful to my Catholic Faith unlike you who became the Great Apostate and heretic and the bitterest bolox ever. Evviva Maria!

      Delete
    7. 'I do not mirror you in any way. I just send your own insults back to you.' You really are dazzlingly stupid, aren't you? 😅

      Jeez! You're thicker than I even thought. 😅😅

      The arsehole insults me in return (repaying evil with evil), and yet deludes herself into thinking that there is no sin in this. 😅😅😅

      Boy!! Are you in for a shock one day, you lying coward.

      Hah! Hah! Hah! 😅😅😅😅

      😆

      Delete
    8. Mad Magna Caca at 21:32

      GET OUT AND GET A JOB YOU PARASITE YOU ARE A DRAIN ON SOCIETY .

      You are in for even bigger shock you drunken degenerate arsehole the fires of hell in my opinion wont be hot enough for you.

      I am certainly not a coward I'm well able for the likes of you, and I only tell the truth something that is a stranger to you.

      Hah! Hah! Hah!

      just sayin' like

      Evviva Maria!

      Delete
  7. Seriously Pat , you post this moron without comment. Are you aware of who this guy is? A gay man who sees his gayness as a sinful condition - a guy who recently lost a post and caused much controversy by suggesting that in certain circumstance paedophilia was ok. He’s one of those characters that appears to genuinely enjoy provoking a reaction. Sometimes deliberately provoking a reaction can be helpful in promoting useful debate Unfortunately, this guy gives every appearance just liking the spotlight because it’s all about him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, this particular journalist is not one that does any credit whatsoever to the Guardian. I am surprised that they are not a lot more discerning..

      Delete
  8. A right-wing nutjobby like Micheal Voris sans syrup of figs.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Another one who has been snubbed by a man at some point and never got over it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @7.21
      Yip.. Without a doubt... You've said it!

      Delete
  10. Maybe the official RC Church should change it's name to the sexual orientation association. It's pomp ritual pennies but no God. Genuine people need to pull away and regroop but have ye the courage to do it. Is It balls or balloons under them schkerts hi but

    ReplyDelete
  11. Is this really supposed to be from The Spectator ? It's so biased, so evidently written by a wild eyed ultra right loon that I'm surprised it has got past the Spectator junior sub-editor.

    Anyhow, you only have to read the first paragraph or so to get the gist: it's all the fault of the gays. They are the ones who have brought the Church low. Well, anybody knows that the pathology of abuse, not just in the Church, but everywhere, have little to do with sexual orientation, but with power and authority and abuse of those. He conveniently forgets that by far the most abuse that is perpetrated is by straight men in their own homes against their own daughters. So, let's forget this particular lie and false news that he is trotting out.

    Where does this guy want to take up back to ? He seems to want to take us away from the Church's teaching on social justice, because he thinks it is too Marxist. Back to what ? Where conservative, right wing oligarchs were able to control the destiny of millions of poor people to their own aggrandisement and profit ?

    Oh, and he want to get the priesthood back to healthy manhood, does he ? Do you remember the old days of hard drinking, hard smoking, hard living 'manly' clergy who ruled to roost and spent their time telling other people what to do, and luxuriated in deference from the faithful. I think not !

    Give me the lavender mob any day. At least they are colourful and interesting. And talented, whereas the manly and robust pastors of the past were just thick and uncultured.

    They had this argument in the Anglican Church in England some decades ago about gay clergy taking over, until they realised that it was the gays who were in some of the most deprived and underprivileged parishes int he country, faithfully serving, and keeping the show on the road. Without them, the Church would fail to function. I reckon it's the same with our gay clergy. Without them it would not only be a rather dreary landscape, but it would be depopulated of clergy who are prepared to do the work that others won't do.

    Put that in your pipe and smoke it, Milo, and I still don't believe that this shite got past that junior sub-editor.

    ReplyDelete
  12. An account of Donal O'Neill's removal from Maynooth and suspension from priesthood should be examined. There is much beneath the surface to explain his departure from maynooth 4 years early and why Ray put the squeeze on him. All is not what it seems

    ReplyDelete
  13. There has always been a weird symbiosis between gay men and the extreme right. Gays love the drama and the kinky dressing up, but are also conveniently expendable and can take the rap when a clean up or moral crusade is called for. Consider this unhealthy dynamic in terms of the Catholic priesthood and much becomes clear: self-hating homosexuals in pursuit of manliness welcome here. Milo’s rant says much about the gay homophobes who abound in the Catholic Church and other conservative organizations. I think it was the journalist Ed West ( dear old Mary Kenny’s son, by the way ) who remarked that the British Conservative party was the most gay friendly organization after the Catholic Church. Milo is the alt-right’s house pet, as the type of homosexual who thinks that decriminalization took away all the fun. From time to time he craps on the carpet, as when he declared last year that 13 year old boys and older men might be fine together, but his reappearance in The Speccie, the weekly comic of the British establishment, suggests all is forgiven so long as he as he sticks his shiny boot in uppity women, blacks and gay men. I think we get the picture, Milo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mary McAleese sums them up pretty well as as "fake hetero homophobes."

      Delete
  14. Lots of ad hominem attacks on Milo. Did they not teach logic in the sem course?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ---Enough "logic taught" to recognise a disgruntled fake when we read one anyway!

      Delete
    2. @ 10.37. Re/your reiteration of the "ad hominen" fallback... Quite.... but please understand this was not a meeting of the Maynooth learners' debating society--When derogatory and badly-researched material appears in print and is presented as serious in argument, then it is perfectly legitimate to examine the source i e. the author and his credentials and intended effect.
      (It is creditable that you studied the beginnings of logic etc as a student but you now may need to move on well beyond that and continue to develop rather than stay stuck in student mode)

      Delete
  15. You know, I had begun a serious reply to the posts above but I have just had a flash of insight. Why waste my energy on crowd of twisted morons? The boring repetitious comments day after day by the same idiots all of whom seem to be disgruntled clerics, former clerics or seminary rejects is not worthy or serious engagement. That poor creature who styles himself Magna Carta is in need of help - serious psychiatric help. As for the presiding 'Bishop' oh dear, do I need to say anything. It's a sad blog for crazy people.....and as they say on Dragon's Den "for that reason I'm out"

    ReplyDelete
  16. Oh my Gosh Pat this is so scary, Milo is literally a Nazi.

    ReplyDelete
  17. An account of Donal O'Neill's removal from Maynooth and suspension from priesthood should be examined. There is much beneath the surface to explain his departure from maynooth 4 years early and why Ray put the squeeze on him. All is not what it seems

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He was a strange priest. He told me I was not allowed friends outside of Maynooth and used to tell stories of him sneaking out with a particular lady.

      Delete
  18. Has Milo got a dead squirrel on his head like Michael Voris ? Seems to be an ex-gay preference.

    It's always the same with these ex-gays - turn on what you really are out of anger and frustration that you can't be honest about who you are anymore. Not a recipe for a happy, healthy and integrated person or life. And it shows in their self-loathing, hateful rantings.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The diocese of New York has a dossier Voris and his syrup craving bonce.

      Delete
  19. Yon loon in today's Spectator blog should be done for defamation of character.. On the To Do list ... We don't need his rants..

    ReplyDelete
  20. Milo is searingly clear-eyed on this, but those who engage in sodomy do not want to see it. They prefer darkness to the light. They do not WANT to see the truth. BTW the Church was not instituted to be an NGO, which is what homosexuals McCarrick, Farrell, Tobin, Wuerl et al have reduced it to. Lots and lots of lovely dollars pouring into the coffers of the usccb from govt. If I use this blog as a metric then the calibre of priests being produced today is literally shocking. They seem to be homosexual, psychologically immature, non-Catholics who were too lazy or lacking in the grades to qualify as social workers. What depth of spiritual guidance / direction / comfort could they possibly provide to anyone? As to receiving the Blessed Eucharist from their unbelieving hands........... Give me a holy priest, give me a padre pio. He would have chased the lot of you from the confession box - but you rationalise it to yourselves that there must have been something wrong with him and that your lazy " tolerance" and "acceptance", which allows you to live as louchely as you want and take the easy way out by never challenging the social mores of today, is what the gospel is really about. Funny how the gospel lets you off the hook in today's world, very convenient for you. Wear your pink pussy hat, spout sjw drivel, sodomise other men, tell children that's how to live and be kept in material comfort. Our Lady, who none of you believe in anyhow ( being above all that, lol! ) needs to clean house, and fast. She has been pleading with people since at least 1917 to fast and pray against your demise, but obviously not enough was done when we read here of the sheer paucity of your faith. If you don't actually believe then be honest, LEAVE and get yourselves jobs as social workers, counsellors, accountants, registrars at the City Hall, care workers, public speakers,political agitators, Protestant ministers, rent boys or whatever it is you seem to think is so important. But stop calling yourselves Catholic priests and leeching off Catholic lay people unless you actually BELIEVE and are prepared to follow the "rules" like you would have to elsewhere.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oooohhh, such an angry man, aren't you. Either you are a rabid right wing conservative evangelical protestant of the Northern Ireland type, or you are a member of Church Militant. It must be exhausting being so angry ! Calm down, dearie, and have a wank.

      Delete
    2. I am a Catholic female and not angry, but certainly disgusted. Your response was typical - an example of nothing but personal abuse towards anyone who dares to say what you don't want to hear, mixed in with base sexual put-downs ( in your warped estimation).
      BTW, most of the anger and vitriol which I see either on-line or reported via other media involves leftist identity advocates: homosexual, transgender and the rest. The level of sheer hatred and outrage when their concocted reality is in anyway challenged is seismic and surely indicative of deep troubles. God gave us 10 basic rules to guide us in living healthily, we ignore them at our peril. Why would I want to take your advice, exactly?

      Delete
    3. You still need to calm down, dear ! Think of your blood pressure. Think of the effect all that hateful energy in you is having on those around you. Live and let live, and worry about yourself rather than what others are doing. And, when there is so much hatred and vitriol aimed at others by you, it suggests that there is real stuff going on in you that has not been resolved. So, sort that out first of all, and then come back to us and we can perhaps have a civilised debate. Now, a good few drags on a spliff would probably be a good start. Then some mindfulness. Perhaps yoga or Pilates ? Have you tried Kefir. Good for the bowels. Once you are regular and fluid you will feel so much better having got all that bile out of you. You need to do something ! I've only got your well being at heart, honest !

      Delete
    4. 11.58: Go to the loo, have a good play with yourself and rid yourself of your sexual hang ups. Then after you've deposited your nonsense and flushed it away, open the scriptures and try to grasp something of the decency, mercy, tolerance and understanding of God. What an injustice you do to his name and memory through your ugly homophobia and crass ignorance. You vile ignoramus.

      Delete
    5. 14:03, and those '10 basic rules' have been fundamentally ignored by most Christian denominations (including the Roman Catholic Church) for very many centuries, because everyone of them habitually violated the Sixth Commandment (and, therefore, virtually all of the others, including, and especially, the First).

      Delete
    6. Listen to yourselves! Are you lot priests? Your comments and the sentiments behind them are seriously disturbed. Lots of projection and just pure badness. Hard to imagine that there are people who behave in this way.

      Delete
  21. I recently wrote to Michael Mullanney about abuse I endured in Maynooth. He said that abuse in Maynooth seminary is not a matter for the college to respond to, but that having destroyed all files relating to me they would now co-operate with the Gardai. He then said that, without being discourteous to me he would never again reply to a communication from me.

    I must say he is not exactly a first class priest.

    I would have expected an offer to have a transparent review of my complaint in accordance with the college complaints process - I have never been offered access to any kind of transparent process. It is perfectly reasonable for a person to both want a complaint heard transparently.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am sorry you had this response, but not surprised. It is the standard church response to anyone in your position, which remains unchanged despite this kind of response to those they have damaged, being revealed because of the abuse scandal and claims they have changed.
      They haven't.

      Delete
    2. @17.25
      Thank you for your kind words annd insight.

      I sometimes wonder as to if they can change at all. The ansolute lack of sincerity is frightening. Even in 2016 the revelations (some years after my stint there) were horrifying. A friend of mine who was a seminarian there told me a good deal more than the newspapers did; and what is being covered up today is very much against The Faith.

      Delete
  22. Pastoral Letter from + Longley of Birmingham preparing his people for his and + Vincent of Westminster appearance before the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) week beginning 12 November. I don't think they will get a comfortable ride.

    See:

    https://www.birminghamdiocese.org.uk/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=3a6593c0-af80-427c-a23e-a0db75ba9ce4

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Elsie was never a comfortable ride.

      Delete
  23. Whatever about anything he says, Milo is definitely quite easy on the eye......post a pic of him Pat......he's most certainly 'eye candy'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Really @ 15.01?
      What Milo looks like is completely irrelevant.. "Eye candy" indeed..Are you an impressionable teenager perhaps?

      Delete
    2. 15.01: Are you serious? Did you see photo of Milo? I wouldn't let him near my dog! His views are thwarted, confusing and bizarre.

      Delete
  24. Well, he's definitely got hair (unlike Michael Voris), but he's evidently decided to mimic Voris' squirrel with its cut and its highlights. Too pretty for me. I like em rougher.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He'd do well acting out some Broadway musical... in the middle of the street. Old Compton Street, for example, with Conor Gannon.

      Delete
  25. Why are so many of the abusers and enablers of abusers in the liberal wing of the Church? Is it because they have no sense of sin, are universalists or simply disdain traditional Catholic moral theology? I'm thinking of, e.g. CMOC, Danneels, Bergoglio, McCarrick, Wuerl, Hume, Brendan Smyth, Ledwith, Mahoney, Maradiaga, Cocopalmerio, Jack McCabe.

    It's no wonder the Mos are hopping mad with Milo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 17:58, 'traditional Catholic moral theology' included traditional disobedience of Jesus' bedrock command that we must love our enemies.

      It is the traditionalists, like you, who have no sense of sin. 😆

      Delete
    2. There's plenty in the traditional wing who fail too. In fact those trads are more likely to cover up and be protected by the institution.

      Delete
  26. Not a question of traditional/conservative/liberal/leftwing/rightwing! The real question is when will the catholic church regain the apostle's charism of being BORN AGAIN?
    The neocats say that the charisms of the Holy Spirit now sit with the laity. Well it certainly appears that they don't lie with the hierarchy any longer! So they appear to be right. They are one of the movements filling the vacuum caused by the sin of the apostles. But they are presumptuous.
    The Holy Spirit will protect the Church and give real sainthood and freedom from slavery to sin to those who seek true wisdom! Come Holy Spirit. Give true love and humility




    ReplyDelete
  27. Sorry Fraser, but I think the Milo piece should never have seen the light of day... Definitely was one for our cutting room floor...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Poor, effeminate Milo. A fruit, and a fruitcake. 😆

      Delete
  28. Mullaney needs to cooperate with Maynooth Survivors. To this day Mullaney has blocked all attempts for compensation to be paid for the rehabilitation and counselling for the survivors of Maynooth Institutional abuse.

    ReplyDelete